Effect of storage on physico-chemical, microbiological and sensory characteristics of goat milk fermented by Lactobacillus strains isolated from minas artisanal cheeses

Gustavo L. C. Valente ,
Gustavo L. C. Valente
Contact Gustavo L. C. Valente

Escola de Veterinária, enum.country.N/A

Leonardo B. Acurcio ,
Leonardo B. Acurcio

Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais,

Ranier C. Figueiredo ,
Ranier C. Figueiredo

Escola de Veterinária, enum.country.N/A

Felipe M. Sant'Anna ,
Felipe M. Sant'Anna

Escola de Veterinária, enum.country.N/A

Rommel F. Brito ,
Rommel F. Brito

Escola de Veterinária, enum.country.N/A

Luigi P. V. Freitas ,
Luigi P. V. Freitas

Escola de Veterinária, enum.country.N/A

Andréia M. Silva ,
Andréia M. Silva

Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei,

Marcelo R. Souza ,
Marcelo R. Souza

Escola de Veterinária, enum.country.N/A

Cláudia F. A. M. Penna
Cláudia F. A. M. Penna

Escola de Veterinária, enum.country.N/A

Published: 18.10.2021.

Volume 10, Issue 2 (2021)

pp. 398-410;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/10.2.2021.a10

Abstract

Lactobacillus spp. are lactic acid bacteria which have important implications for the food industry due to their fermentation capacities. The aims of this research were to produce fermented goat milks with Lactobacillus plantarum B7 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus D1, isolated from Brazilian artisanal cheeses, and to evaluate their physico-chemical, microbiological and sensorial qualities during 30 days of storage at 7°C. The goat milks, fermented by B7, D1, co-culture and a Lactobacillus casei Shirota control, possessed acceptable physico-chemical characteristics to meet fermented milk standards established by Brazilian legislation and maintain the viability of Lactobacillus spp. throughout the shelf life of the products. The products were microbiologically safe. D1 fermented goat milk gave higher consumer sensory quality acceptance and purchase intention (p<0.05) than other treatments, thus Lactobacillus rhamnosus D1 is recommended for fermented goat milk production.

Keywords

References

1.
Ahmed J, Razig K. Effect of levels of buttermilk on quality of set yoghurt. J Nutr Food Sci. 2017.
2.
Alves L, Dos Santos Richards N, Becker L, De Andrade D, Milani L, Rezer A, et al. Ciência Rural. 2009. p. 39.
3.
Amani E, Eskandari M, Shekarforoush S. The effect of proteolytic activity of starter cultures on technologically important properties of yogurt. Food Science & Nutrition. 2017. p. 525–37.
4.
Bermudez-Humaran L, Aubry C, Motta JP, Deraison C, Steidler L, Vergnolle N, et al. Engineering lactococci and lactobacilli for human health. Current Opinion in Food Science. 2013. p. 278–83.
5.
Brasil. Instrução Normativa no 46 de 23 de outubro de. Regulamento Técnico de Identidade e Qualidade de Leites Fermentados. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil; 2007.
6.
Cisse H, Muandze-Nzambe J, Somda N, Sawadogo A, Drabo S, Tapsoba F, et al. Assessment of safety and quality of fermented milk of camels, cows, and goats sold and consumed in five localities of burkina faso. Veterinary World. 2019. p. 295–304.
7.
Coggins P, Rowe D, Wilson J, Kumari S. Storage and temperature effects on appearance and textural characteristics of conventional milk yogurt. Journal of Sensory Studies. 2010. p. 549–76.
8.
Costa H, Souza M, Acúrcio L, Cunha A, Resende M, Nunes A. Potencial probiótico in vitro de bactérias ácidoláticas isoladas de queijo-de-minas artesanal da serra da canastra, mg. Arquivo Brasileiro de. Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia. 2013. p. 1858–66.
9.
Deeth H, Fitz-Gerald C, Wood A. A convenient method for determining the extent of lipolysis in milk. 1975.
10.
Dos Santos K, De Oliveira I, Lopes M, Gil Cruz A, Buriti F, Cabral L. Addition of grape pomace extract to probiotic fermented goat milk: The effect on phenolic content, probiotic viability and sensory acceptability. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2017. p. 1108–15.
11.
Downes F, Ito K. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods Washington. American Public Health Association; 2001. p. 676.
12.
El-Hatmi H, Jrad Z, Salhi I, Aguibi A, Nadri A, Khorchani T. Comparison of composition and whey protein fractions of human, camel, donkey, goat and cow milk. Mljekarstvo. 2015. p. 159–67.
13.
Ijfs October. 2021. p. 398–410.
14.
Emediato R, Siqueira E, Stradiotto M, Maestá S, Piccinin V, Domingues A. Queijo tipo prato de leite de ovelhas alimentadas com dietas contendo gordura protegida. Veterinária e Zootecnia. 2009. p. 228–38.
15.
Gaenzle M. Current Opinion in Food Science. 2015. p. 106–17.
16.
Garcia R, Travassos A. Leite fermentado caprino sabor umbu: Elaboração e aceitabilidade. Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (Impresso). 2012. p. 134–9.
17.
Gaudreau H, Champagne C, Jelen P. The use of crude cellular extracts of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus 11842 to stimulate growth of a probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus culture in milk. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2005. p. 83–90.
18.
Yogurt: enumeration of characteristic microorganisms colony count technique at 37°C. IDF; 1988.
19.
Lee YK, Salminen S. The coming of age of probiotics. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 1995. p. 241–5.
20.
Lim Y, Foo H, Loh T, Mohamad R, Abdullah N. Comparative studies of versatile extracellular proteolytic activities of lactic acid bacteria and their potential for extracellular amino acid productions as feed supplements. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 2019. p. 117–8.
21.
Minervini F, Bilancia M, Siragusa S, Gobbetti M, Caponio F. Fermented goats’ milk produced with selected multiple starters as a potentially functional food. Food Microbiology. 2009. p. 559–64.
22.
Moreno-Montoro M, Navarro-Alarcon M, Bergillos-Meca T, Gimenez-Martinez R, Sanchez-Hernandez S, Olalla-Herrera M. Physicochemical, nutritional, and organoleptic characterization of a skimmed goat milk fermented with the probiotic strain lactobacillus plantarum c4. Nutrients. 2018.
23.
INTER-NATIONAL 21th Ed. Official Methods of Analysis. 2019. p. 2–1973.
24.
INTER-NATIONAL 21th Ed. Official Methods of Analysis. 2019. p. 46–1945.
25.
INTER-NATIONAL 21th Ed. Official Methods of Analysis. 2019. p. 5–1947.
26.
INTER-NATIONAL 21th Ed. Official Methods of Analysis. 2019. p. 52–1961.
27.
Ranadheera C, Evans C, Adams M, Baines S. Co-culturing of probiotics influences the microbial and physico-chemical properties but not sensory quality of fermented dairy drink made from goats’ milk. Small Ruminant Research. 2016. p. 104–8.
28.
Salva S, Nunez M, Villena J, Ramon A, Font G, Alvarez S. Development of a fermented goats’ milk containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus: In vivo study of health benefits. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2011. p. 2355–62.
29.
Ijfs October. 2021. p. 398–410.
30.
Slacanac V, Bozanic R, Hardi J, Szabo J, Lucan M, Krstanovic V. Nutritional and therapeutic value of fermented caprine milk. International Journal of Dairy Technology. 2010. p. 171–89.
31.
Tournas V, Stack M, Mislivec P, Koch H, Bandler R. Bam: Yeasts, molds and mycotoxins. Bacteriological analytical manual. 2001.
32.
Yadav A, Singh J, Yadav S. Composition, nutritional and therapeutic values of goat milk: A review. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 2016. p. 96–102.
33.
Zalan Z, Hudacek J, Stetina J, Chumchalova J, Halasz A. Production of organic acids by Lactobacillus strains in three different media. European Food Research and Technology. 2010. p. 398–410.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by