Effect of Emulsifier Diacetyl Tartaric Acid Ester of Mono- and Diglycerides (DATEM) and Enzyme Transglutaminase on Quality Characteristics of Rice Bran Croissants
Rice bran (RB) is a good source of dietary fibre. Addition of rice bran into croissant interferes with the gluten formation of dough and hence affect the physicochemical properties of croissant. The effect of RB addition on physicochemical properties of croissant were determined by using 0%, 10% and 15% RB. Besides, additives such as emulsifiers and enzymes can be used in pastry to enhance the physicochemical properties of croissant. Diacetyl tartaric acid ester of mono-diglycerides (DATEM) and transglutaminase (TGase) were used respectively on 0%, 10% and 15% RB to investigate the effect of such additives on physicochemical properties of croissant. Increased % RB and DATEM, produced a significant decrease in specific volume, together with a significant increase in colour, hardness and chewiness. With increased % RB, TGase caused significant increase in colour, hardness and chewiness but significant decrease in specic volume. The overall moisture sorption isotherm curves of the croissant belong to the Type III isotherm, also known as Flory-Huggins Isotherm (J-shaped). The critical aw obtained from the Guggenheim-Anderson-de Boer (GAB) equation showed that the shelf life of croissants were not positively impacted by the addition of DATEM and TGase and the addition of RB did not cause any significant positive effects on quality characteristics of croissants.
Aacc. American association of cereal chemists, aacc. Approved Methods of the AACC. AACC International; 2000.
2.
Aoac. Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2000.
3.
Azizi M, Rao G. Effect of surfactant gels on dough rheological characteristics and quality of bread. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2004. p. 545–52.
4.
Barbosa-Cánovas G, Fontana A, Schmidt S, Labuza T. Water activity in foods: Fundamentals and applications. 2008.
5.
Basman A, Koksel H, Ng P. Effects of increasing levels of transglutaminase on the rheological properties and bread quality characteristics of two wheat flours. European Food Research and Technology. 2002. p. 419–24.
6.
Bhosale S, Vijayalakshmi D. Processing and nutritional composition of rice bran. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science. 2015. p. 74–80.
7.
Boukid F, Carini E, Curti E, Bardini G, Pizzigalli E, Vittadini E. Effectiveness of vital gluten and transglutaminase in the improvement of physicochemical properties of fresh bread. 2018. p. 92.
8.
Breeding C, Beyer R. Food chemistry: Principles and applications. 2000.
9.
West Sacramento: Science Technology System. p. 421–31.
10.
Brunauer S. The adsorption of gases and vapors. Physical adsorption. 1945. p. 1.
11.
Caballero P, Gomez M, Rosell C. Improvement of dough rheology, bread quality and bread shelf-life by enzymes combination. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007. p. 42–53.
12.
Carter B, Galloway M, Campbell G, Carter A. The critical water activity from dynamic dewpoint isotherms as an indicator of crispness in low moisture cookies. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization. 2015. p. 463–70.
13.
Chin N, Goh S, Rahman R, Hashim D. Functional effect of fully hydrogenated palm oil-based emulsifiers on baking performance of white bread. International Journal of Food Engineering. 2007.
14.
Collar C, Santos E, Rosell C. Assessment of the rheological profile of fibreenriched bread doughs by response surface methodology. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007. p. 820–6.
15.
Eduardo M, Svanberg U, Ahrne L. Effect of hydrocolloids and emulsifiers on the shelf-life of composite cassava-maizewheat bread after storage. Food Science & Nutrition. 2016. p. 636–44.
16.
Farrell D. Utilization of rice bran in diets for domestic-fowl and ducklings. Worlds Poultry Science Journal. 1994. p. 115–31.
17.
Gaupp R, Adams W. Emulsifiers in food technology. 2014. p. 121–46.
18.
Gerrard J, Fayle S, Wilson A, Newberry M, Ross M, Kavale S. Dough properties and crumb strength of white pan bread as affected by microbial transglutaminase. Journal of Food Science. 1998. p. 472–5.
19.
Gerrard J, Newberry M, Ross M, Wilson A, Fayle S, Kavale S. Pastry lift and croissant volume as affected by microbial transglutaminase. Journal of Food Science. 2001. p. 312–4.
20.
Saeed G, Arif S, Ahmed S, Ali M, Shih R, F. Influence of rice bran on rheological properties of dough and in the new product development. Journal of food science and technology. 2009. p. 62.
21.
Gomez M, Del Real S, Rosell C, Ronda F, Blanco C, Caballero P. Functionality of different emulsifiers on the performance of breadmaking and wheat bread quality. European Food Research and Technology. 2004. p. 225–30.
22.
Huang W, Li L, Wang F, Wan J, Tilley M, Ren C, et al. Effects of transglutaminase on the rheological and mixolab thermomechanical characteristics of oat dough. Food Chemistry. 2010. p. 934–9.
23.
Issara U, Rawdkuen S. Rice bran: A potential of main ingredient in healthy beverage. International Food Research Journal. 2016.
24.
Joye I, Lagrain B, Delcour J. Use of chemical redox agents and exogenous enzymes to modify the protein network during breadmaking -a review. Journal of Cereal Science. 2009. p. 11–21.
25.
Kent N, Evers A. Technology of cereals: An introduction for students of food science and agriculture. Woodhead Publishing; 1994.
26.
Koksel H, Ozay D, Ng K, P, Steffe F, J. Effects of transglutaminase enzyme on fundamental rheological properties of sound and bug-damaged wheat flour doughs. Cereal Chemistry -Cereal Chem. 2001. p. 26–30.
27.
Marco C, Rosell C. Effect of different protein isolates and transglutaminase on rice flour properties. Journal of Food Engineering. 2008. p. 132–9.
28.
Mckee L, Latner T. Underutilized sources of dietary fiber: A review. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 2000. p. 285–304.
29.
Nagendra Prasad M, Sanjay K, Khatokar M, S. Health benefits of rice brana review. Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences. 2011. p. 1.
30.
Ameh O, Gernah M, D, Igbabul D, B. Physico-chemical and sensory evaluation of wheat bread supplemented with stabilized undefatted rice bran. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2013. p. 43–8.
31.
Oladunmoye O, Akinoso R, Olapade A. Evaluation of some physicalchemical properties of wheat, cassava, maize and cowpea flours for bread making. Journal of Food Quality. 2010. p. 693–708.
32.
Peressini D, Pin M, Sensidoni A. Rheology and breadmaking performance of rice-buckwheat batters supplemented with hydrocolloids. Food Hydrocolloids. 2011. p. 340–9.
33.
Popov-Raljic J, Mastilovic J, Lalicic-Petronijevic J, Popov V. Investigations of bread production with postponed staling applying instrumental measurements of bread crumb color. Sensors. 2009. p. 8613–23.
34.
Ranasalva N, Visvanathan R. Development of bread from fermented pearl millet flour. Journal of Food Processing and Technology. 2014.
35.
Ribotta P, Perez G, Leon A, Anon M. Effect of emulsifier and guar gum on micro structural, rheological and baking performance of frozen bread dough. Food Hydrocolloids. 2004. p. 305–13.
36.
Rogers D, Hoseney R. Breadmaking properties of datem. Bakers Digest. 1983. p. 12.
37.
Saunders R. The properties of rice bran as a food stuff. Cereal Foods World. 1990. p. 632–62.
38.
Sawa K, Inoue S, Lysenko E, Edwards N, Preston K. Effects of purified monoglycerides on canadian short process and sponge and dough mixing properties, bread quality and crumb firmness during storage. Food Chemistry. 2009. p. 884–90.
39.
Sharma R, Srivastava T, Saxena D. Studies on rice bran and its benefits-a review. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 2015. p. 107–12.
40.
Stampfli L, Nersten B. Emulsifiers in bread making. Food Chemistry. 1995. p. 353–60.
41.
Walter T. Degradation of gluten in wheat bran and bread drink by means of a proline-specific peptidase. Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences. 2014. p. 4.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.