Issue image

More articles from Volume 11, Issue 1, 2022

Student perceptions of collaborative and blended learning in food science and technology

Comparisons between flour qualities produced by three different mills: buhler, quadrumat, and industry mills

Development and sensory evaluation of a cookie from composite sorghum and cowpea flour

Influence of extraction methods on phenolic compounds from pulp and peel of genipap (Genipa americana L.) fruit

Influence of extraction solvent on the biological properties of maritime pine bark (Pinus pinaster)

Citations

Crossref Logo

5

Crossref Logo

Inés Mármol, Daniel Pellicer

(2023)

Agri-food Waste Valorisation

, ()

10.1039/BK9781837670093-00045

Crossref Logo

Diana Barros, Liliana Grenho, Maria Helena Fernandes, Pedro Sousa Gomes, Élia Fernandes

(2025)

Correlation of Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of the Aqueous Pinus pinaster Aiton Bark Extract Within a Cytocompatible Concentration Range

Antioxidants, 14(11)

10.3390/antiox14111377

Crossref Logo

Marika Lamendola, Giacomo Fiore, Piotr Gulczynski, Marzenna Maria Smolenska, Livio Torta

(2025)

In Vitro Fungistatic Bioactivity of a Biostimulant Based on Pine Bark Extract Against Phytopathogenic Fungi

Horticulturae, 11(11)

10.3390/horticulturae11111375

Crossref Logo

José Ignacio Alonso-Esteban, Marcio Carocho, Diana Barros, Manuela Vaz Velho, Sandrina Heleno, Lillian Barros

(2022)

Chemical composition and industrial applications of Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) bark and other non-wood parts

Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 21(3)

10.1007/s11157-022-09624-1

Crossref Logo

Diana Barros, José Ignacio Alonso-Esteban, Tiane C. Finimundy, Carla Pereira, Josiana A. Vaz, Ricardo Pereira-Pinto, Élia Fernandes, Preciosa Pires, Joana Santos, Lillian Barros, Manuela Vaz-Velho

(2025)

Bioactive and Phenolic Profiles in Pinus pinaster Bark: A Comparative Study of Microwave and Ultrasound Extraction Methods

ChemEngineering, 10(1)

10.3390/chemengineering10010002

Influence of extraction solvent on the biological properties of maritime pine bark (Pinus pinaster)

Inés Mármol ,
Inés Mármol

Universidad de Zaragoza

Catarina Vieito ,
Catarina Vieito

Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo

Vanessa Andreu ,
Vanessa Andreu

Université de Perpignan

Annabel Levert ,
Annabel Levert

Université de Perpignan

Anaïs Amiot ,
Anaïs Amiot

Université de Perpignan

Cédric Bertrand ,
Cédric Bertrand

Université de Perpignan

Mª Jesús Rodríguez-Yoldi ,
Mª Jesús Rodríguez-Yoldi

Universidad de Zaragoza

Joana Santos ,
Joana Santos

Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo

Manuela Vaz-Velho
Manuela Vaz-Velho
Contact Manuela Vaz-Velho

Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo

Published: 18.04.2022.

Volume 11, Issue 1 (2022)

pp. 51-62;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/11.1.2022.a5

Abstract

Maritime pine bark (Pinus pinaster Aiton subsp. atlantica) is rich in polyphenols with known bioactive properties which are beneficial for human health. However, biological activities of bark extracts depend on the type of polyphenols extracted and the characteristics of these extractives depend on several factors such as the type of solvents used. The influence of the extraction solvent on the composition and consequently on the properties of the extracts has been poorly described. Thus, in this study the influence of the extraction solvent (water, ethanol and ethanol-water (50/50 v/v%)) on the antibacterial and anticancer properties of P. pinaster bark samples were evaluated. LC-DAD-MS profiling of the different extracts was also carried out to study their polyphenol composition. Results show that extraction solvent must be carefully chosen with respect to foreseeing use of bark extracts, since ethanolic and hydroethanolic extracts displayed the greatest antibacterial activity whereas water extracts showed increased anticancer properties.

Keywords

References

1.
Sunil C, Xu B. An insight into the health-promoting effects of taxifolin (dihydroquercetin). Phytochemistry. 2019;112066.
2.
Oliff H, Blumenthal M. Scientific and clinical monograph for Pycnogenol®, 2019 update. (tech. rep.). 2019;
3.
Pourmasoumi M, Hadi A, Mohammadi H, Rouhani M. Effect of pycnogenol supplementation on blood pressure: A systematic review and metaanalysis of clinical trials. Phytotherapy Research. 2020;(1):67–76.
4.
Ramos L, Santos C, Mello D, Theodoro L, Oliveira F, Brito G, et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae Planktonic and Biofilm Reduction by Different Plant Extracts: In Vitro Study. The Scientific World Journal. 2016;1–5.
5.
Rasband W. ImageJ : Image processing and analysis in Java. 1997;

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by