Comparisons between flour qualities produced by three different mills: buhler, quadrumat, and industry mills

Abeer S. Alhendi Orcid logo ,
Abeer S. Alhendi
Contact Abeer S. Alhendi

Grain Board of Iraq,

Tamadher H. Ahmad ,
Tamadher H. Ahmad

State Company for Grain Processing,

Wasan S. Albayati ,
Wasan S. Albayati

State Company for Grain Processing,

Balsam Q. Almukhtar ,
Balsam Q. Almukhtar

Grain Board of Iraq,

Zahraa K. Ali ,
Zahraa K. Ali

State Company for Grain Processing,

Nuhoodh K. Al-Hayani
Nuhoodh K. Al-Hayani

State Company for Grain Processing,

Published: 18.04.2022.

Volume 11, Issue 1 (2022)

pp. 19-27;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/11.1.2022.a2

Abstract

Three types of mills (Buhler, Quadrumat, and industry mill) have been used to determine the effect of mill type on the quality of the produced flour. Quadrumat and Buhler mills are usually used to produce flour at a laboratory level. Flour quality has been determined physically, chemically, and rheologically. Results showed that the particle size of flour produced by Buhler mill (FPB) was finer (mostly less than 132 μm) than other produced flour, while flour produced by Quadrumat mill (FPQ) had 8% particle size bigger than 50gg, which is more than Iraqi accepted limit (5%). The moisture content of FPQ exceeded the moisture content limit (14%). While, all flour produced by industry mills (FPI) was within the Iraqi standard in term of particle sizes and moisture content. Gluten content of FPB was higher than other produced flours; however, most increments were not significantly different. The results also showed that using different mills has no clear effect on the gluten index and alpha-amylase activity. Farinogram and extensogram results showed that FPQ was stronger than other produced flour followed by FPI. In conclusion, the quality of FPQ was closer to the quality of FPI, however, Quadrumat mill needs to be adjusted to produce flour with finer particle sizes and lower moisture content. The Buhler mill, on the other hand, needs to be adjusted to produce flour with bigger particle size. Both laboratory mills (Quadrumat and Buhler) need to be adjusted to produce flour that expresses FPI correctly.

Keywords

References

1.
Zaidel A, Chin D, Yusof N, Rahman Y, R. Analysis and correlation studies on gluten quantity and quality during production. Journal of Applied Sciences. 2009. p. 1686–94.
2.
Abbasi H, Seyedain Ardabili S, Mohammadifar M, Emam-Djomeh Z. Comparison of trial and error and genetic algorithm in neural network development for estimating farinograph properties of wheat-flour dough. Nutrition and food sciences research. 2015. p. 29–38.
3.
Alhendi A, Almukhtar B, Al-Haddad F. Changes in flour quality of four iraqi wheat varieties during storage. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science. 2019.
4.
Bressiani J, Oro T, Santetti G, Almeida J, Bertolin T, Gomez M, et al. Properties of whole grain wheat flour and performance in bakery products as a function of particle size. Journal of Cereal Science. 2017. p. 269–77.
5.
Dencic S, Mladenov N, Kobiljski B. Effects of genotype and environment on breadmaking quality in wheat. International Journal of Plant Production. 2011. p. 71–81.
6.
Di Cagno R, De Angelis M, Lavermicocca P, De Vincenzi M, Giovannini C, Faccia M, et al. Proteolysis by sourdough lactic acid bacteria: Effects on wheat flour protein fractions and gliadin peptides involved in human cereal intolerance. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002. p. 623–33.
7.
Diósi G, Móré M, Sipos P. Role of the farinograph test in the wheat flour quality determination. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae. 2015. p. 104–10.
8.
Gaines C. Associations among soft wheat-flour particle-size, protein-content, chlorine response, kernel hardness, milling quality, white layer cake volume, and sugar-snap cookie spread. Cereal Chemistry. 1985. p. 290–2.
9.
Hadnadev T, Pojic M, Hadnadev M, Torbica A. The role of empirical rheology in flour quality control. 2011.
10.
Hassan E, Mustafa A, Elfaki A. Effect of different starches on dough rheological properties of wheat flour. 2015.
11.
Kaur A, Bala R, Singh B, Rehal J. Effect of replacement of sodium chloride with mineral salts on rheological characteristics of wheat flour. American Journal of Food Technology. 2011. p. 674–84.
12.
Mohammed I, Ahmed A, Senge B. Dough rheology and bread quality of wheat-chickpea flour blends. Industrial Crops and Products. 2012. p. 196–202.
13.
Perten H. Application of the falling number method for evaluating alpha-amylase activity. Cereal chem. 1964. p. 127–40.
14.
Polat P, Yagdi K. Investigations on the relationships between some quality characteristics in a winter wheat population. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2017. p. 108–13.
15.
Posner E, Deyoe C. Changes in milling properties of newly harvested hard wheat during storage. Cereal Chemistry. 1986. p. 451–6.
16.
Wheat products: wheat flour for bread industry. Central Organization for Standardization and Quality Control. Quality Standard of Iraq. Ministry of Planning; 1988.
17.
Wahyono A, Lee SB, Yeo SH, Kang WW, Park HD. Effect of Mill Type on the Flour Quality 27 and Agriculture. Emirates Journal of Food IJFS. 2016. p. 242–50.
18.
Weipert D. 13 fundamentals of rheology and spectrometry. 2006.
19.
Wieser H. Chemistry of gluten proteins. Food microbiology. 2007. p. 115–9.
20.
Yazar G, Duvarci O, Tavman S, Kokini J. Non-linear rheological properties of soft wheat flour dough at different stages of farinograph mixing. Applied Rheology. 2016. p. 19–27.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by