Short food supply chains (SFSCs) are a still developing phenomenon in the world of food production and distribution. They involve a direct connection between local farmers and consumers, with minimal intermediaries involved. SFSCs have gained significant interest in recent years due to their potential to promote sustainable agriculture and support local communities. As a result, many governments, organisations, and individuals have been exploring ways to develop and promote these chains as a viable alternative to conventional food supply chains. However, it is still unclear how SFSCs products are perceived differently by producers and consumers: what makes SFSCs products more desirable? Starting from a European project (SmartChain), answers from twenty questionnaires from SFSCs actors across Europe were analysed to understand the strengths and weaknesses of SFSCs products according to the producers. From their answers, 18 quality criteria referred to SFSCs products were obtained and then proposed to consumers through a second questionnaire. The second questionnaire aimed to better understand whether the producers’ points of view matched the consumers’ points of view. From the analysis of the results, it was possible to understand what criteria were considered quality attributes by producers and consumers. Organic production and the presence of both trained and vulnerable personnel were not particularly relevant to the quality perception of SFSCs products. The storage method, the assortment range, and the processing of the products were not evaluated as quality criteria. The consumers who were interviewed perceived the quality of a food product coming from an SFSC linked to the characteristics of the social context of the product. They associated products sold in SFSCs with non-processed food. Overall, such a survey can be considered a useful tool to deepen our knowledge about short food supply chains and offers several ideas for further studies and analysis.
Agovino M, Crociata A, Quaglione D, Sacco P, Sarra A. Good taste tastes good: Cultural capital as a determinant of organic food purchase by Italian consumers: Evidence and policy implications. Ecological Economics. 2017. p. 66–75.
2.
Allaire G, Casabianca F, Thévenod-Mottet E. Labels of origin for food: Local development, global recognition. 2011. p. 1–12.
3.
Aouinait C, Christen D, Carlen C, Massri C, Reipurth M, Hieke S, et al. Barriers and facilitators of purchasing from short food supply chains in europe: Insights from a stakeholder perspective. International Journal of Food Studies. 2022. p. 196-I207.
4.
Carbone A, Gaito M, Senni S. Consumer attitudes toward ethical food: Evidence from social farming in Italy. Journal of Food Products Marketing. 2009. p. 337–50.
5.
Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist C. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare: Mobile abattoirs versus transportation to slaughter. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 2007. p. 321–44.
6.
Carpio C, Isengildina-Massa O. Consumer willingness to pay for locally grown products: The case of South Carolina. Agribusiness. 2009. p. 412–26.
7.
Casolani N, Perito M, Liberatore L. The role of innovation poles in agri-food system development: The case of Abruzzo’s model. International Journal on Food System Dynamics. 2019. p. 315–31.
8.
Quality perception of Short Food Supply Chains Products 141 on Food System Dynamics. SeriesInformation International Journal IJFS. p. 127–44.
9.
Cheyns E, Ponte S. Ecology, Capitalism and the New Agricultural Economy. Routledge; 2018. p. 71–94.
10.
Chiffoleau Y, Dourian T. Sustainable food supply chains: Is shortening the answer? A literature review for a research and innovation agenda. Sustainability. 2020. p. 9831.
11.
Coderoni S, Perito M. Sustainable consumption in the circular economy: An analysis of consumers’ purchase intentions for waste-to-value food. 2020.
12.
Cox D, Evans G, Lease H. The influence of information and beliefs about technology on the acceptance of novel food technologies: A conjoint study of farmed prawn concepts. Food Quality and Preference. 2007. p. 813–23.
13.
Csordás A, Lengyel P, Füzesi I. Who prefers regional products? A systematic literature review of consumer characteristics and attitudes in short food supply chains. Sustainability. 2022. p. 8990.
14.
Vita D, D’amico G, M, Via L, Caniglia G, E. Quality perception of PDO extra-virgin olive oil: Which attributes most influence Italian consumer? Agricultural Economics Review. 2014. p. 46–56.
15.
Espejel J, Fandos C, Flavián C. The role of intrinsic and extrinsic quality attributes on consumer behaviour for traditional food products. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal. 2007. p. 681–701.
16.
Evola R, Peira G, Varese E, Bonadonna A, Vesce E. Short food supply chains in Europe: Scientific research directions. Sustainability. 2022. p. 14063602.
17.
Florkowski W, Shewfelt R, Brueckner B, Prussia S, Furnols M, Guerrero L. Postharvest handling: A systems approach. Meat Science. Elsevier; 2014. p. 361–71.
18.
Balázs I, Eyden-Wood B, Blackett T, Schmutz M, Kneafsey U, Venn M, et al. Publications Office of the European Union. 2013.
19.
Galli F, Brunori G. Short food supply chains as drivers of sustainable development: Evidence document (tech. rep.). 2013.
20.
Gilg A, Battershill M. To what extent can direct selling of farm produce offer a more environmentally friendly type of farming? Some evidence from France. Journal of Environmental Man-IJFS. 2000. p. 195–214.
21.
Golini R, Luzzini D, Crippa L. Short food supply chain configurations in the Italian food industry. 2013.
22.
Grunert K. Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 2005. p. 369–91.
23.
Hinrichs C. The practice and politics of food system localization. Journal of Rural Studies. 2003. p. 33–45.
24.
Hirschfeld H. A connection between correlation and contingency. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 1935. p. 520–4.
25.
Irving S, Harrison R, Rayner M. Ethical consumerism: Democracy through the wallet. Journal of Research for Consumers. 2022.
26.
Jarzebowski S, Bourlakis M, Bezat-Jarzebowska A. Short food supply chains (SFSC) as local and sustainable systems. Sustainability. 2020. p. 4715.
27.
Kawecka A, Gebarowski M. Short food supply chains: Benefits for consumers and food producers [Number: 3]. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development. 2015. p. 459–66.
28.
Kirwan J. The interpersonal world of direct marketing: Examining conventions of quality at UK farmers’ markets. Journal of Rural Studies. 2006. p. 301–12.
29.
Lanfranchi M, Schimmenti E, Campolo M, Giannetto C. The willingness to pay of Sicilian consumers for a wine obtained with sustainable production method: An estimate through an ordered probit sample-selection model. Wine Economics and Policy. 2019. p. 203–15.
30.
Velly L, Goulet R, Vinck F, D. Allowing for detachment processes in market innovation: The case of short food supply chains. Consumption Markets & Culture. 2021. p. 313–28.
31.
Lee HJ, Hwang J. The driving role of consumers’ perceived credence attributes in organic food purchase decisions: A comparison of two groups of consumers. Food Quality and Preference. 2016. p. 141–51.
32.
Lyon P, Collie V, Kvarnbrink EB, Colquhoun A. Shopping at the farmers’ market: Consumers and their perspectives. Journal of Foodservice. 2009. p. 21–30.
33.
Marsden T, Banks J, Bristow G. Food supply chain approaches: Exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis. 2000. p. 424–38.
34.
Morris C. Quality assurance schemes: A new way of delivering environmental benefits in food production. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2000. p. 443–8.
35.
Moser R, Raffaelli R, Thilmany D, Moser R, Raffaelli R, Thilmany D. Consumer preferences for fruit and vegetables with credencebased attributes: A review. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 2011. p. 121–42.
36.
Murdoch J, Marsden T, Banks J. Quality, nature, and embeddedness: Some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector. Economic Geography. 2000. p. 127–44.
37.
Noelke C, Caswell J. 21874 Publisher: American Agricultural Economics Association. 2000.
38.
Annual meeting. 2000.
39.
Nygård B, Storstad O. Deglobalization of food markets? Consumer perceptions of safe food: The case of Norway. Sociologia Ruralis. 1998. p. 35–53.
40.
Ojasalo J. Quality for the individual and for the company in the business-tobusiness market: Concepts and empirical findings on trade-offs. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2006. p. 162–78.
41.
Ophuis P, Van Trijp H, Del Giudice T, Caracciolo T, F. Quality dimensions and consumer preferences: A choice experiment in the Italian extra-virgin olive oil market. Agricultural Economics Review. 1995. p. 100–12.
42.
Panouillé M, Ralet M, Bonnin E, Thibault J. Recovery and reuse of trimmings and pulps from fruit and vegetable processing. Woodhead Publishing; 2007. p. 417–47.
43.
Ponte S. Convention theory in the anglophone agro-food literature: Past, present and future. Journal of Rural Studies. 2016. p. 12–23.
44.
Pozo H, Barcelos A, Akabane G. Critical factors of success for quality and food safety management: Classification and prioprization. Universal Journal of Industrial and Business Management. 2018. p. 30–41.
45.
Renting H, Marsden T, Banks J. Understanding alternative food networks: Exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 2003. p. 393–411.
46.
Resano H, Sanjuán A, Albisu L. Consumers’ response to the EU Quality policy allowing for heterogeneous preferences. Food Policy. 2012. p. 355–65.
47.
Santana-Méridas O, González-Coloma A, Sánchez-Vioque R. Agricultural residues as a source of bioactive natural products. Phytochemistry Reviews. 2012. p. 447–66.
48.
Scozzafava G, Gerini F, Dominici A, Contini C, Casini L. Reach for the stars: The impact on consumer preferences of introducing a new top-tier typology into a PDO wine. Wine Economics and Policy. 2018. p. 140–52.
49.
Sebok A, Varsányi K, Kujáni K, Xhakolari V, Fricz Á, Castellini A, et al. Value propositions for improving the competitiveness of short food supply chains built on technological and nontechnological innovations. International Journal of Food Studies. 2022. p. 4.
50.
Sellitto M, Vial L, Viegas C. Critical success factors in short food supply chains: Case studies with milk and dairy producers from Italy and Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018. p. 1361–8.
51.
Sini M, Sini M. The importance of obtaining a more balanced relationship between the long and short food chain in the worldwide market for farm and food produce: A contribution to the debate on the capabilities of the short chain. 2010.
52.
Squatrito S, Arena E, Palmeri R, Fallico B. Public and private standards in crop production: Their role in ensuring safety and sustainability. Sustainability. 2020. p. 606.
53.
Srnka K. Culture’s role in marketers’ ethical decision making: An integrated theoretical framework. Academy of Marketing. Science Review. 2004. p. 1–32.
54.
Stanco M, Lerro M, Marotta G, Nazzaro C. Consumers’ and farmers’ characteristics in short food supply chains: An exploratory analysis. Studies in Agricultural Economics. 2019. p. 67–74.
55.
Thiéblemont-Dollet S. Laurent; 2006.
56.
Thévenot. L’action au pluriel. Sociologie des régimes d’engagement. Éditions de l’Université de Lorraine;
57.
Questions de communication; p. 1–3.
58.
Thomé K, Cappellesso G, Ramos E, Duarte S. Food supply chains and short food supply chains: Coexistence conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021. p. 123207.
59.
Torquati B, Paffarini C, Tempesta T, Vecchiato D. Evaluating consumer perceptions of social farming through choice modelling. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2019. p. 238–46.
60.
Vega-Zamora M, Torres-Ruiz F, Parras-Rosa M. Towards sustainable consumption: Keys to communication for improving trust in organic foods. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019. p. 511–9.
61.
Verneau F, Caracciolo F, Coppola A, Lombardi P. Consumer fears and familiarity of processed food: The value of information provided by the FTNS. Appetite. 2014. p. 140–6.
62.
Vidigal M, Minim V, Simiqueli A, Souza P, Balbino D, Minim L. Food technology neophobia and consumer attitudes toward foods produced by new and conventional technologies: A case study in Brazil. LWT -Food Science and Technology. 2015. p. 832–40.
63.
Watts D, Ilbery B, Maye D. Making reconnections in agro-food geography: Alternative systems of food provision. Progress in Human Geography. 2005. p. 22–40.
64.
Zander K, Hamm U. Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food. Food Quality and Preference. 2010. p. 495–503.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
