Understanding social innovation in short food supply chains: an exploratory analysis

Eugenia Petropoulou ,
Eugenia Petropoulou
Contact Eugenia Petropoulou

University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece

Theo Benos ,
Theo Benos

University of Crete and Zuyd University of Applied Sciences,

Irini Theodorakopoulou ,
Irini Theodorakopoulou

Agricultural Economics Research Institute (AGRERI) and University of Crete,

Constantine Iliopoulos ,
Constantine Iliopoulos

Agricultural Economics Research Institute (AGRERI),

Alessandra Castellini ,
Alessandra Castellini

Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna,

Vilma Xhakollari ,
Vilma Xhakollari

Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna,

Maurizio Canavari ,
Maurizio Canavari

Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna,

Annarita Antonelli ,
Annarita Antonelli

Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari (CIHEAM BARI),

Damiano Petruzzella
Damiano Petruzzella

Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari (CIHEAM BARI),

Published: 28.07.2022.

Volume 11, Issue 3 (2022)

pp. 182-195;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/11.si.2022.a5

Abstract

Short food supply chains (SFSCs) are alternative food chains that have gained ground and contribute to the global food system's sustainable transition. To explore how to enhance their capacity to act and benefit society at large, we turned to scholarly and policy work on Social Innovation (SI). We concentrated on understanding what SI in SFSCs is and how it may stimulate their potential, following a two-phase approach. In Phase 1, employing a two-step systematic literature review, we generated a rich database of SI definitions, but no suitable definition was found. We proceeded to craft a domain-specific systems-centred definition, positing that SFSCs can be seen as social living systems, while SIs in SFSCs may be seen as processes that bring about change (e.g., new mentalities) and result in the creation of sustainable value for the actors involved and beyond. With the aid of an additional scholarly review, we also determined that the drivers of SI that matter are those that secure actor engagement in the co-design and co-development stages of SI (e.g., training). In Phase 2, we attempted to empirically validate the findings from Phase 1 in 12 Community of Practice (CoP) events in nine European countries. We found partial support for the SI definition, strong support for the vital role of trust, and concluded that, in any SFSC, it is critical to have a group of dedicated actors that have realized their role as (co-)leaders in co-shaping their own future.

Keywords

References

1.
Adler E, Clark R. How it’s done: An invitation to social research. Wadsworth Publishing Company; 1999.
2.
Aggestam V, Fleiss E, Posch A. Scaling-up short food supply chains? a survey study on the drivers behind the intention of food producers. Journal of Rural Studies. 2017. p. 64–72.
3.
Berti G, Mulligan C. Competitiveness of small farms and innovative food supply chains: The role of food hubs in creating sustainable regional and local food systems. Sustainability. 2016.
4.
Bock B. Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis. 2016. p. 552–73.
5.
Butkevičienė E. Social innovations in rural communities: Methodological framework and empirical evidence. Socialiniai mokslai. 2009. p. 80–8.
6.
Cajaiba-Santana G. Social innovation: Moving the field forward. a conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2014. p. 42–51.
7.
Cappelli A, Cini E. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2020. p. 566–7.
8.
Capra F, Luisi P. The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge University Press; 2014.
9.
Castro-Arce K, Vanclay F. Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical frame-IJFS July 2022 Volume 11 pages SI182-SI195 Social innovation in short food supply chains SI193 work to assist community-based initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies. 2020. p. 45–54.
10.
Caulier-Grice J, Davies A, Patrick R, Norman W, Charatsari C, Kitsios F, et al. Empirical And Policy Foundations For Building Social Innovation in Europe"(TEPSIE), European Commission-7th Framework Programme, European Commission and DG Research, Brussels. 2012. p. 643–52.
11.
Davies A, Simon J, Patrick R, Norman W. The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe"(TEPSIE), European Commission-7th Framework Programme. DG Research. European Commission; 2012. p. 1–50.
12.
Ec. Cap specific objectives explained: Farmer position in value chains. brief no 3. european commission, dg agriculture and rural development. 2019.
13.
Edwards-Schachter M, Wallace M. Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017. p. 64–79.
14.
Eip-Agri. Innovation in short food supply chains. creating value together. 2019.
15.
Giampietri E, Verneau F, Del Giudice T, Carfora V, Finco A. A theory of planned behaviour perspective for investigating the role of trust in consumer purchasing decision related to short food supply chains. Food Quality and Preference. 2018. p. 160–6.
16.
Grimm R, Fox C, Baines S, Albertson K. Social innovation, an answer to contemporary societal challenges? locating the concept in theory and practice. Innovation-the. European Journal of Social Science Research. 2013. p. 436–55.
17.
Kidwell B, Hardesty D, Childers T. Consumer emotional intelligence: Conceptualization, measurement, and the prediction of consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research. 2008. p. 154–66.
18.
Koen M, Du Plessis E, Koen V. Nursing Research Using Data Analysis: Qualitative Designs and Methods in Nursing. 2014. p. 181–96.
19.
Lioutas E, Charatsari C. Smart farming and short food supply chains: Are they compatible? Land Use Policy. 2020.
20.
Meadows D. Thinking in systems: A primer. 2008.
21.
Mele C, Pels J, Polese F. A brief review of systems theories and their managerial applications. Service science. 2010. p. 126–35.
22.
Moulaert F, Mehmood A, Maccallum D, Leubolt B. Social innovation as a trigger for transformations-the role of research. Publications Office of the European Union; 2017.
23.
Mulgan G, Tucker S, Ali R, Sanders B. Social innovation: What it is, why it matters, how it can be accelerated. 2007.
24.
Mundler P, Jean-Gagnon J. Short food supply chains, labor productivity and fair earnings: An impossible equation? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2020. p. 697–709.
25.
Neumeier S. Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research?-proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis. 2012. p. 48–69.
26.
Neumeier S. Social innovation in rural development: Identifying the key factors of success. Geographical Journal. 2017. p. 34–46.
27. ?
ref=130 130816-9uut45lj4q% 5C&title=Covid-19-and-the-food-andagriculture -sector -Issues -and -policyresponses. OECD; 2020.
28.
Onat N, Kucukvar M, Halog A, Cloutier S. Systems thinking for life cycle sustainability assessment: A review of recent developments, applications, and future perspectives. Sustainability. 2017.
29.
Periac F, David A, Roberson Q. Clarifying the interplay between social innovation and sustainable development: A conceptual framework rooted in paradox management. European Manage-ment Review. 2018. p. 19–35.
30.
Peris-Ortiz M, Gómez J, Marquez P. Strategies and best practices in social innovation. Springer; 2018. p. 978–81.
31.
Phillips W, Lee H, Ghobadian A, O’regan N, James P. Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management. 2015. p. 428–61.
32.
Pol E, Ville S. Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of socio-economics. 2009. p. 878–85.
33.
Rover O, De Gennaro B, Roselli L. Social innovation and sustainable rural development: The case of a brazilian agroecology network. Sustainability. 2017.
34.
Rucabado-Palomar T, Cuellar-Padilla M. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2020. p. 182–91.
35.
Russo-Spena T, Tregua M, Bifulco F. Searching through the jungle of innovation conceptualisations system, network and ecosystem perspectives. Journal of Service Theory and Practice. 2017. p. 977–1005.
36.
Sellitto M, Machado Vial L, Viegas C. Critical success factors in short food supply chains: Case studies with milk and dairy producers from italy and brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018. p. 1361–8.
37.
Senge P, Hamilton H, Kania J. The dawn of system leadership. Stanford Social Innovation Review. 2015. p. 27–33.
38.
Seuring S, Gold S. Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management-An International. Journal. 2012. p. 544–55.
39.
July. SI182-SI195 Social innovation in short food supply chains SI195. 2022.
40.
Sinclair S, Baglioni S. Social innovation and social policy-promises and risks. Social Policy and Society. 2014. p. 469.
41.
Van Der Have R, Rubalcaba L. Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy. 2016. p. 1923–35.
42.
Vitterso G, Torjusen H, Laitala K, Tocco B, Biasini B, Csillag P, et al. Short food supply chains and their contributions to sustainability: Participants’ views and perceptions from 12 european cases. Sustainability. 2019. p. 11–7.
43.
Voltan A, De Fuentes C. Managing multiple logics in partnerships for scaling social innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2016. p. 446–67.
44.
Westley F, Antadze N. Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. Innovation Journal. 2010.
45.
July. 2022.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by