Cooking and functional properties of parboiled milled local rice marketed in the south-east zone of Nigeria

Chinenye E. Azuka ,
Chinenye E. Azuka
Contact Chinenye E. Azuka

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nigeria Nsukka, enum.country.N/A

Iro Nkama ,
Iro Nkama

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nigeria Nsukka, enum.country.N/A

Chinwendu R. Eze ,
Chinwendu R. Eze

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nigeria Nsukka, enum.country.N/A

Nahemiah Danbaba ,
Nahemiah Danbaba

National Cereals Research Institute (NCRI), Badeggi, Bida Niger state,

Felix U. Asoiro
Felix U. Asoiro

3Department of Agricultural and Bioresources Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka,

Published: 18.10.2020.

Volume 9, Issue 2 (2020)

pp. 319-331;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/9.2.2020.a5

Abstract

Imported rice is perceived to have better cooking properties than locally grown rice in Nigeria and it has increased its market share while reducing patronage for local rice. Rice in Nigeria has many applications, including consumption as whole cooked grain or dumpling or use as an adjunct in making beverages. Eighteen varieties of parboiled milled local rice and three imported rice varieties, coded Ip1, Ip2 and Ip3, were studied for their cooking and functional properties using standard methods. There was a significant (p<0.05) increase in the dimensions of all the rice varieties when cooked. There was a 25 g increase in the grain weight and an elongation ratio of more than 1.26 in all the rice varieties. Ghesua had the highest cooked grain weight (68.67 g) while Omor-Mas (6.00) and R-Bus (6.00) had the highest volume expansion ratio (VER). The VER was more than 3.00 for all the rice varieties. All the local rice varieties imbibed less water (17.67-25.33 ml) compared to the imported rice varieties (26.00-27.67ml) before they reached their optimum cooking time. The imported rice varieties were of soft gel consistency (89.67-73.50 mm) and intermediate amylose content (20.71-23.14 %) while the local rice varied in amylose and gel consistency. Abakiliki-Mas (27.00 mm) and R-8 (33.67 mm) were of hard gel-consistency, intermediate (21.11 %) and high amylose (27.21 %) content respectively and have not been exploited although they would be appropriate for making canned rice, dry mixes and rice-noodles.

Keywords

References

1.
Abiona O. Impact of nerica rice project on small scale rice farmer food accessibility. A case study ofon Obafemi Owode Local government Area, Ogun State, Nigeria. 2011.
2.
Akaeze H. Consumer preference for imported rice in nigeria-perceived quality differences or habit persistence? Michigan State University. Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics. 2010.
3.
Akande S, Onyegbula A, Salawu R, Oladipo A, Adetunji C. Effects of post-harvest handling on hydrogen cyanide content of cassava products obtained from ilorin-west urban markets, nigeria. African Journal of Food Science. 2017. p. 362–8.
4.
Anonymous. The origin of rice. Basmati.ru. 2009.
5.
Bhonsle S, Krishnan S. Grain quality evaluation and organoleptic analysis of aromatic rice varieties of goa, india. CCSE; 2010.
6.
Bida O. Rice quality: Rice post-harvest technology training program. Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Wealth and Natural Resources, General Administartion of Agriculture Rice Promotion Unit, Gezira State. 2013.
7.
Cagampang G, Perez C, Juliano B. A gel consistency test for eating quality of rice. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 1973. p. 1589–94.
8.
Danbaba N, Nkama I, Badau M, Ukwungwu M, Maji A, Abo M, et al. Optimization of rice parboiling process for optimum head rice yield: A response surface methodology (rsm) approach. focus. 2014.
9.
Diagne A, Bamba I, Manful J, Ajayi O. Historic opportunities for rice growers in nigeria. Inter-reseaux Department rural. 2011.
10.
Gariboldi F. Rice testing methods and equipment. 1979.
11.
Imolehin E, Wada A. Meeting the rice production and consumption demands of nigeria with improved technologies. International Rice Commission Newsletter. 2000. p. 33–41.
12.
Juliano B. A simplified assay for milledrice amylose. Cereal Science Today. 1971. p. 334–60.
13.
Muthayya S, Sugimoto J, Montgomery S, Maberly G. Technical considerations for rice fortification in public health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2014. p. 7–14.
14.
Mutters R, Thompson J. Rice quality handbook. UCANR Publications; 2009.
15.
Odenigbo A, Ngadi M, Ejebe C, Woin N, Ndindeng S. Physicochemical, cooking characteristics and textural properties of tox 3145 milled rice. Journal of Food Research. 2014. p. 82.
16.
Oko A, Ugwu S. The proximate and mineral compositions of five major rice varieties in abakaliki, south-eastern nigeria. International Journal of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2011. p. 25–7.
17.
Oko A, Ubi B, Nahemiah D. Rice cooking quality and physico-chemical characteristics: A comparative analysis of selected local and newly introduced rice varieties in ebonyi state, nigeria. Food and Public Health. 2012. p. 43–9.
18.
Sanusi M, Akinoso R, Danbaba N. Evaluation of physical, milling and cooking properties of four new rice (oryza sativa l.) varieties in nigeria. International Journal of Food Studies. 2017.
19.
Singh N, Kaur L, Sodhi N, Sekhon K. Physicochemical, cooking and textural properties of milled rice from different indian rice cultivars. Food Chemistry. 2005. p. 253–9.
20.
Thomas R, Wan-Nadiah A, Bhat R. Physiochemical properties, proximate composition, and cooking qualities of locally grown and imported rice varieties marketed in penang, malaysia. International. Food Research Journal. 2013. p. 1679–85.
21.
Webb B. Criteria of rice quality. Rice: Chemistry and technology. 1972. p. 102–39.
22.
Yadav R, Khatkar B, Yadav B. Morphological, physicochemical and cooking properties of some indian rice (oryza sativa l.) cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Technology. 2007. p. 203–10.
23.
IJFS October. 2020. p. 319–31.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by