Assessment and Evaluation of Student Learning Through a Project-Based Assignment on Note by Note Cooking

Róisín M. Burke ,
Róisín M. Burke
Contact Róisín M. Burke

Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Pauline Danaher
Pauline Danaher

Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Published: 18.10.2020.

Volume 9, Issue 2 (2020)

pp. 282-294;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/9.2.2020.a2

Abstract

Many innovative teaching and learning methods are used in higher level education including project-based learning (PBL). Since 2012 a PBL assignment project has been undertaken by master students of the Advanced Molecular Gastronomy module at Technological University Dublin (TU Dublin). The aim is to stimulate student learning and creativity by using Note by Note cooking in a PBL assignment while at the same time complying with the requirements of the annual International Note by Note contest which is held in Paris, France. Direct and indirect assessment methods were used to assign individual grades and to gather student feedback about the module. The direct methods were both formative and summative. The indirect method used was a student feedback questionnaire. Results to date (2012-2019) showed that 92% of learners successfully passed the module. However, further evaluation of individual assessment results revealed that most students achieved higher scores for finding and using resources, asking further questions and developing their own answers than for analysing, synthesising and evaluating information (P≤0.01). Overall students were happy with the module content and said that they learnt about Note by Note cooking, chemical compounds, researching, independent-thinking and perseverance. In future students should carry out a more in-depth analysis, synthesis and evaluation of information.

Keywords

References

1.
Bell S. Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House. 2010. p. 39–43.
2.
Boaler J. Mathematics for the moment, or the millennium. Education Week. 1999. p. 30–4.
3.
Breslow L. Methods of measuring learning outcomes and value added teaching and learning laboratory, massachusetts institute of technology. 2007.
4.
Burke R, Danaher P. Interdisciplinary teaching and learning within molecular gastronomy education: Does it benefit students? International Journal of Molecular Gastronomy. 2018. p. 1–12.
5.
Burke R, Danaher P. Note by note: A new revolution in cooking. 2016.
6.
Burke R, This H, Kelly A. Reference module in food science. 2016.
7.
Burke R, Danaher P, Traynor M. The development of molecular gastronomy as a subject discipline at the dublin institute of technology. 2012.
8.
Condliffe B, Visher M, Bangser M, Drohojowska S, Saco L. Project-based learning: A literature review. Mdrc; 2016.
9.
Creswell J. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2003.
10.
Dahm K. Combining the tasks of grading individual assignments and assessing program outcomes in project-based courses. Journal of STEM Education. 2014. p. 20–9.
11.
Donnelly R, Fitzmaurice M. Collaborative project-based learning and problembased learning in higher education: A consideration of tutor and student role in learner-focused strategies. 2005.
12.
Doppelt Y. Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2003. p. 255–72.
13.
Grant M. Getting a grip on projectbased learning: Theory, cases and recommendations. Meridian: A middle school computer technologies journal. 2002. p. 83.
14.
Krajcik J, Shin N. The cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 275–97.
15.
Larmer J, Mergendoller J. Gold standard pbl: Essential project design elements. 2015.
16.
Mc Donnell C, O’connor C, Seery M. Developing practical chemistry skills by means of student-driven problem based learning mini-projects. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. 2007. p. 130–9.
17.
Instructional guide for university faculty and teaching assistants. 2012.
18.
Nusche D. Assessment of learning outcomes in higher education: A comparative review of selected practices. OECD, Directorate for Education. OECD Education Working Papers; 2008.
19.
Shewfelt R. Becoming a food scientist. 2012. p. 25–32.
20.
Spronken-Smith R, Walker R. Can inquiry-based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? Studies in Higher Education. 2010. p. 723–40.
21.
This H. Note by note cooking: : The Future of Food. Columbia University Press; 2014.
22.
This H. International contest for note by note cooking n°6. 2017.
23.
Thomas J. The Autodesk Foundation. 2000.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by