The purpose of this study was to investigate optimum test conditions of acoustical-mechanical measurement of wafer analysed by Acoustic Envelope Detector attached to the Texture Analyser. Forcedisplacement and acoustic signals were simultaneously recorded applying two different methods (3-point bending and cutting test). In order to study acoustical-mechanical behaviour of wafers, the parameters “maximum sound pressure”, “total count peaks” and “mean sound value” were used and optimal test conditions of microphone position and test speed were examined. With a microphone position of 45° angle and 1 cm distance and at a low test speed of 0.5 mm/s wafers of different quality could be distinguished best. The angle of microphone did not have significant effect on acoustic results and the nu
Alvarez M, Saunders D, Vincent J, Jeronimidis G. An engineering method to evaluate the crisp texture of fruit and vegetables. Journal of Texture Studies. 2000. p. 457–73.
2.
Baltsavias A. Mechanical properties of short doughs and their corresponding biscuits. Baltsavias; 1996.
3.
Blonska A, Marzec A, Blaszczyk A. Instrumental evaluation of acoustic and mechanical texture properties of shortdough biscuits with different content of fat and inulin. Journal of Texture Studies. 2014. p. 226–34.
4.
Bourne M. Food texture and viscosity: concept and measurement. Academic press; 2002.
5.
Castro-Prada E, Luyten H, Lichtendonk W, Hamer R, Van Vliet T. An improved instrumental characterization of mechanical and acoustic properties of crispy cellular solid food. Journal of Texture Studies. 2007. p. 698–724.
6.
Chanvrier H, Jakubczyk E, Gondek E, Gumy JC. Insights into the texture of extruded cereals: structure and acoustic properties. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. 2014. p. 61–8.
7.
Chen J, Karlsson C, Povey M. Acoustic envelope detector for crispness assessment of biscuits. Journal of Texture Studies. 2005. p. 139–56.
8.
Christensen C, Vickers Z. Relationships of chewing sounds to judgments of food crispness. Journal of Food Science. 1981. p. 574–8.
9.
Dematte M, Pojer N, Endrizzi I, Corollaro M, Betta E, Aprea E, et al. Effects of the sound of the bite on apple perceived crispness and hardness. Food Quality and Preference. 2014. p. 58–64.
10.
Duizer L. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition. Woodhead Publishing; 2004. p. 146–66.
11.
Edmister J, Vickers Z. Instrumental acoustical measures of crispness in foods. Journal of Texture Studies. 1985. p. 153–67.
12.
Giacosa S, Belviso S, Bertolino M, Bello B, Gerbi V, Ghirardello D, et al. Hazelnut kernels (corylus avellana l.) mechanical and acoustic properties determination: comparison of test speed, compression or shear axis, roasting, and storage condition effect. Journal of Food Engineering. 2016. p. 59–68.
13.
Gregersen S, Povey M, Kidmose U, Andersen M, Hammershøj M, Wiking L. Identification of important mechanical and acoustic parameters for the sensory quality of cocoa butter alternatives. Food Research International. 2015. p. 637–44.
14.
Jakubczyk E, Gondek E, Tryzno E. Application of novel acoustic measurement techniques for texture analysis of coextruded snacks. 2017. p. 582–9.
15.
Mallikarjunan P. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition. Woodhead Publishing; 2004. p. 82–105.
16.
Martinez-Navarrete N, Moraga G, Talens P, Chiralt A. Water sorption and the plasticization effect in wafers. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2004. p. 555–62.
17.
Piazza L, Giovenzana V. Instrumental acoustic-mechanical measures of crispness in apples. Food Research International. 2015. p. 209–15.
18.
Roudaut G, Dacremont C, Pamies B, Colas B, Le Meste M. Crispness: a critical review on sensory and material science approaches. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2002. p. 217–27.
19.
Saeleaw M, Duerrschmid K, Schleining G. The effect of extrusion conditions on mechanical-sound and sensory evaluation of rye expanded snack. Journal of Food Engineering. 2012. p. 532–40.
20.
Seymour S, Hamann D. Crispness and crunchiness of selected low moisture foods. Journal of Texture Studies. 1988. p. 79–95.
21.
Tesch R, Normand M, Peleg M. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 1996. p. 347–54.
22.
Varela P, Chen J, Fiszman S, Povey M. Crispness assessment of roasted almonds by an integrated approach to texture description: texture, acoustics, sensory and structure. Journal of Chemometrics. 2006. p. 311–20.
23.
Varela P, Salvador A, Fiszman S. Methodological developments in crispness assessment: effects of cooking method on the crispness of crusted foods. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2008. p. 1252–9.
24.
Vickers Z. Pleasantness of food sounds. Journal of Food Science. 1983. p. 783–6.
25.
Vickers Z. Crispness and crunchiness -a difference in pitch. Journal of Texture Studies. 1984. p. 157–63.
26.
Wiktor A, Gondek E, Jakubczyk E, Nowacka M, Dadan M, Fijalkowska A, et al. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. 2016. p. 375–83.
27.
Zdunek A, Cybulska J, Konopacka D, Rutkowski K. Evaluation of apple texture with contact acoustic emission detector: a study on performance of calibration models. Journal of Food Engineering. 2011. p. 80–7.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
