Regional Laboratory of Public Health / Laboratory of Clinical Bacteriology, Parasitology, Zoonoses, and Geographical Medicine (WHO Collaborating Center), Medical School, University of Crete,
Rethymno, Greece
Regional Laboratory of Public Health / Laboratory of Clinical Bacteriology, Parasitology, Zoonoses, and Geographical Medicine (WHO Collaborating Center), Medical School, University of Crete,
Rethymno, Greece
This paper is a comparative survey of the National Food Safety Systems (NFSS) of the European Union (EU) Member-States (MS) and the Central EU level. The main organizational structures of the NFSS, their legal frameworks, their responsibilities, their experiences, and challenges relating to food safety are discussed. Growing concerns about food safety have led the EU itself, its MS and non-EU countries, which are EU trade-partners, to review and modify their food safety systems. Our study suggests that the EU and 22 out of 27 Member States (MS) have reorganized their NFSS by establishing a single food safety authority or a similar organization on the national or central level. In addition, the study analyzes different approaches towards the establishment of such agencies. Areas where marked differences in approaches were seen included the division of responsibilities for risk assessment (RA), risk management (RM), and risk communication (RC). We found that in 12 Member States, all three areas of activity (RA, RM, and RC) are kept together, whereas in 10 Member States, risk management is functionally or institutionally separate from risk assessment and risk communication. No single ideal model for others to follow for the organization of a food safety authority was observed; however, revised NFSS, either in EU member states or at the EU central level, may be more effective from the previous arrangements, because they provide central supervision, give priority to food control programs, and maintain comprehensive risk analysis as part of their activities.
Berg L. Trust in food in the age of mad cow disease: a comparative study of consumers’ evaluation of food safety in belgium, britain and norway. Appetite. 2004. p. 21–32.
2.
Berman V. Comparative characteristics of state control of food quality and safety in various countries of the world. i. State control of quality and safety of food products in Germany and Denmark. Vopr Pitan. 2001. p. 31–5.
3.
EU Food Safety Almanac. 2009.
4.
Boutrif E, Piniero M. Food control systems. Forum Nutr. 2003. p. 418–21.
5.
Butler D. How bse crisis forced europe out of its complacency. Nature. 1997. p. 6–7.
6.
De Jonge J, Van Trijp H, Jan Renes R, Frewer L. Understanding consumer confidence in the safety of food: its two-dimensional structure and determinants. Risk Anal. 2007. p. 729–40.
7.
Elmi M. Food safety: current situation, unaddressed issues and the emerging priorities. East Mediterr Health J. 2004. p. 794–800.
8.
Fao, Who. Assuring food safety and quality: guidelines for strengthening national food control systems. 2003.
9.
Fuentes V. Food risk communication. 2010.
10.
Food safety: experiences of four countries in consolidating their food safety systems. 1999.
11.
Gao. General accounting office -food safety: a unified, risk-based food safety system needed. 1994.
12.
Gao. General accounting office -food safety: steps should be taken to reduce overlapping inspections and related activities. 2005.
13.
Garcia R, Jukes D. The spanish system of food controls -its administration and enforcement. Food Control. 2004. p. 51–9.
14.
Gaynor C. Food safety controls in europe-challenges and opportunities. 2007.
15.
JAOAC Int. p. 1–5.
16.
Hadjigeorgiou A, Soteriades E, Gikas A, Philalithis A, Psaroulaki A, Tselentis Y. Establishment of a national food safety authority for cyprus: a comparative proposal based on the european paradigm. Food Control. 2012. p. 727–36.
17.
Halkier B, L, H. Shifting responsibilities for food safety in europe: an introduction. Appetite. 2006. p. 127–33.
18.
James W. Food and health in europe: a new basis for action. WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser. 2004.
19.
Kaferstein F, Abdussalam M. Food safety in the 21 s t century. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1999. p. 347–51.
20.
Lang T, Millstone E, Rayner M. Discussion Paper 3, Centre for Food Policy. Thames Valley University; 1997.
21.
Lenz T. Lack of clarity: changing roles and responsibilities in the german food system. Appetite. 2006. p. 152–60.
22.
Lupien J. Prevention and control of food safety risks: the role of governments, food producers, marketers, and academia. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2007. p. 74–9.
23.
Lupien J. The precautionary principle and other non-tariff barriers to free and fair international food trade. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2002. p. 403–15.
24.
Maudoux J, Saegerman C, Rettigner C, Houins G, Van Huffel X, Berkvens D. Food safety surveillance through a risk based control programme: approach employed by the belgian federal agency for the safety of the food chain. Vet Q. 2006. p. 140–54.
25.
Millstone E, Van Zwanenberg P. A crisis of trust: for science, scientists or for institutions. Nat Med. 2000. p. 1307–8.
26.
Millstone E, Van Zwanenberg P. The evolution of food safety policy/making institutions in the uk, eu and codex alimentarius. Social Policy and Administration. 2002. p. 593–609.
27.
Millstone E, Lang T, Naska A, Eames M, Barling D, Van Zwanenberg P, et al. European policy on food safety: comments and suggestions on the white paper on food safety. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2000. p. 458–66.
28.
Mostl K. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (bse): the importance of the food and feed chain. Forum Nutr. 2003. p. 394–6.
29.
Neeliah S, Goburdhun D. National food control systems: a review. Food Reviews International. 2007. p. 35–51.
30.
Nielsen A. Contesting competencechange in the danish food safety system. sciencedirect. Appetite. 2006. p. 143–51.
31.
Pina M, Ferrer C, Rodrigo M, Klein G, Martínez A. Organization of risk analysis in the eu and the new eu food legislation. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2006. p. 407–12.
32.
Post D. The precautionary principle and risk assessment in international food safety: how the world trade organization influences standards. Risk Anal. 2006. p. 1259–73.
33.
Regmi A, Bernstein J. International evidence on food consumption patterns. Technical Bulletin Number. USDA; 2003.
34.
Robertson A, Tirado C, Lobstein T, Jermini M, Knai C, Jensen J, et al. i-xvi. WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser. 2004. p. 1–385.
35.
Silano M, Silano V. The fifth anniversary of the european food safety authority (efsa): . Mission, organization, functioning and main results. Fitoterapia. 2007. p. 23.
36.
Springston J, Weaver Lariscy R. Public relations effectiveness in public health institutions. J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2005. p. 218–45.
37.
Taylor M. Lead or react? a game plan for modernizing the food safety system in the united states. Food Drug Law J. 2004. p. 399–403.
38.
Terragni L. A country that never had a bse crisis: Consensus and tensions in trans-IJFS April. 2006. p. 170–6.
39.
Tselentis G. The sanitary safety and the precautionary principle: Athens. Oikotopia: Issue. 2008. p. 76–9.
40.
Wales C, Harvey M, Warde A. COM .1999. 719 Final. DG SANCO. Geneva. World Health Organization. 2006. p. 187–95.
41.
Who. Improved coordination and harmonization of national safety control services. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. 2001.
42.
William J. Food agencies and food standards: the future regulatory mechanism for the food trade. Nutrition. 2000.
43.
World development indicators database. World Bank; 2004. p. 105–17.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
