The aim of this work was to study the rheological, thermal and some other physical-chemical properties of selected honeys produced in the Northeast of Brazil. Two samples were produced by native “Jandaira” bees (Melipona subnitida) and ten other samples by Africanized bees (Apis mellifera). The samples were analyzed for pH, water activity (aW), soluble solids and water content. Viscosity flow curves were obtained using a rheometer (25ºC, 0-100s-1). Thermal analyses were performed on a differential scanning calorimeter, with heating rate of 10ºC/min (-100 to 100ºC). The water content and the pH of the honey samples varied from 17.2 to 27.9% and from 3.2 to 4.2, respectively, and, the aW of the samples varied from 0.57 to 0.74. Two samples were out of specification with respect to water content, according to Brazilian laws. In relation to rheology, all honey samples showed Newtonian behaviour with no thixotropy or dilatancy. The viscosity varied as an exponential function of the water content. The highest viscosity was obtained for the sample with lower values of water content and aW. Thermograms showed a glass transition (Tg) occurring between -52.4 and -42.6ºC, in the samples produced by Apis mellifera and -67.6 and -57.0ºC for the other samples. A linear relationship was obtained between Tg and water content. In conclusion, the honey viscosity depended on the water content of the product. The higher the water value and therefore the greater the aw, the lower viscosity and Tg of the samples.
Abu-Jdayil B, Ghzawi A, Al-Malah K, Zaitoun S. Heat effect on rheology of light-and dark-colored honey. Journal of Food Engineering. 2002. p. 33–8.
2.
Ahmed J, Prabhu S, Raghavan G, Ngadi M. Physico-chemical, rheological, calorimetric and dielectric behavior of selected Indian honey. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007. p. 1207–13.
3.
Anacleto D, Souza B, Marchini L, Moreti A. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos. 2009. p. 535–41.
4.
A. Official methods of Analysis. 2003.
5.
Aurongzeb M, Kamran Azim M. Antimicrobial properties of natural honey: a review of literature. Pak. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011. p. 44.
6.
Baroni M, Arrua C, Nores M, Fayé P, Díaz M, Chiabrando G, et al. Composition of honey from córdoba (argentina): assessment of north/south provenance by chemometrics. Food Chemistry. 2009. p. 727–33.
7.
Bhandari B, D’arcy B, Kelly C. International Journal of Food Properties. 1999. p. 217–26.
8.
Brasil ; Leis, Decretos. Instrução normativa 11. Regulamento Técnico de Identidade e Qualidade do Mel. Diário Oficial, 20 de outubro de 2000. 2000.
9.
Cavia M, Fernandez-Muino M, Huidobro J, Sancho M. Correlation between moisture and water activity of honeys harvested in different years. Journal of Food Science. 2004. p. 368-C370.
10.
Chirife J, Zamora M, Motto A. The correlation between water activity and % moisture in honey: Fundamental aspects and application to Argentine honeys. Journal of Food Engineering. 2006. p. 287–92.
11.
Cordella C, Antinelli J, Aurieres C, Faucon J, Cabrol-Bass D, Sbirrazzuoli N. Use of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) as a new technique for detection of adulteration in honeys. 1. Study of adulteration effect on honey thermal behavior. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002. p. 203–8.
12.
Costa C, Pereira R. The influence of propolis on the rheological behavior of pure honey. Food Chemistry. 2002. p. 417–21.
13.
Freitas W, Aroucha E, Soares K, Mendes F, Oliveria V, Lucas C, et al. Parâmetros físico-químicos do mel de abelha sem ferrão (melípona subnitida) após tratamento térmico. Acta Veterinária Brasilica. 2010. p. 153–7.
14.
Gleiter R, Horn H, Isengard H. Influence of type and state of crystallisation on the water activity of honey. Food Chemistry. 2006. p. 441–5.
15.
Guo W, Liu Y, Zhu X, Wang S. Dielectric properties of honey adulterated with sucrose syrup. Journal of Food Engineering. 2011. p. 1–7.
16.
Junzheng P, Changying J. General rheological model for natural honeys in china. Journal of Food Engineering. 1998. p. 165–8.
17.
Juszczak L, Fortuna T. Rheology of selected Polish honeys. Journal of Food Engineering. 2006. p. 43–9.
18.
Kaskoniene V, Venskutonis P, Ceksteryte V. Carbohydrate composition and electrical conductivity of different origin honeys from Lithuania. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2010. p. 801–7.
19.
Kayacier A, Karaman S. Rheological and some physicochemical characteristics of selected Turkish honeys. Journal of Texture Studies. 2008. p. 17–27.
20.
Kumar J, Mandal M. Rheology and thermal properties of marketed indian honey. Nutrition & Food Science. 2009. p. 111–7.
21.
Kuroishi A, Queiroz M, Almeida M, Quast L. Evaluation of honey crystallization from the colour and water activity parameters. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology. 2012. p. 84–91.
22.
Larazidou A, Biliaderis C, Bacandritsos N, Sabatini A. Composition, thermal and rheological behavior of selected greek honeys. Journal of Food Engineering. 2004. p. 9–21.
23.
Mora-Escobedo R, Moguel-Ordonez Y, Jaramillo-Flores M, Gutierrez-Lopez G. The composition, rheological and thermal properties of Tajonal (Viguiera dentata) Mexican honey. International Journal of Food Properties. 2006. p. 299–316.
24.
Mossel B, Bhandari B, Arcy D, Caffin N. Properties of selected Brazilian honeys 125 nius model to predict rheological behaviour in some Australian honeys. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft Und-Technologie-Food Science and Technology. 2000. p. 545–52.
25.
Nanda V, Sarkar B, Sharma H, Bawa A. Physico-chemical properties and estimation of mineral content in honey produced from different plants in Northern India. Journal Of Food Composition And Analysis. 2003. p. 613–9.
26.
Oh JH, Yoo B. Effect of Temperature on the Relationship between Moisture Content and Dynamic Rheological Properties of Korean Honey. Food Science and Biotechnology. 2011. p. 261–5.
27.
Ouchemoukh S, Louaileche H, Schweitzer P. Physicochemical characteristics and pollen spectrum of some Algerian honeys. Food Control. 2007. p. 52–8.
Serrano S, Villarejo M, Espejo R, Jodral M. Chemical and physical parameters of Andalusian honey: classification of Citrus and Eucalyptus honeys by discriminant analysis. Food Chemistry. 2004. p. 619–25.
31.
Sobral P, Bittante A. Phase transition of pigskin gelatin. Food Hydrocolloids. 2001. p. 377–82.
32.
Sopade P, Halley P, Bhandari B, Arcy D, Doebler B, Caffin C, et al. Application of the williams-landel-ferry model to the viscosity-temperature relationship of australian honeys. Journal of Food Engineering. 2002. p. 67–75.
33.
Souza B, Marchini L, Oda-Souza M, Carvalho C, Alves R. Caracterização do mel produzido por espécie de melipona illiger, 1806 (apidae: meliponini) da região do nordeste do brasil: 1. Carac-terísticas Físico-Químicas. Química Nova. 2009. p. 303–8.
34.
Terrab A, Recamales A, Hernanz D, Heredua F. Characterization of spanish thyme honeys by their physicochemical claracteristics and mineral contents. Food Chemistry. 2004. p. 537–42.
35.
Villa-Boas J, Malaspina O. Parâmetros físico-químicos propostos para controle de qualidade do mel de abelhas sem ferrão no brasil. mensagem doce. 2005. p. 6–16.
36.
Viuda-Martos M, Ruiz-Navajas Y, Fernández-López J, Pérez-Álvarez J. Functional properties of honey, propolis, and royal jelly. Journal of Food Science. 2008. p. 117-R124.
37.
Wei Z, Wang J, Wang Y. Classification of monofloral honeys from different floral origins and geographical origins based on rheometer. Journal of Food Engineering. 2010. p. 469–79.
38.
Zaitoun S, Ghzawi A, Al-Malah K, Abu-Jdayil B. Rheological properties of selected light colored Jordanian honey. International Journal of Food Properties. 2001. p. 139–48.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
