Optimization of osmotic dehydration of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) slices using Response Surface Methodology

Teresa Delgado ,
Teresa Delgado

CIMO - Mountain Research Center, School of Agriculture, Polytechnic Institute of Braganca, Campus de Stª Apolonia , Braganca , Portugal

LAQV@REQUIMTE, Laboratorio de Bromatologia e Hidrologia, Faculdade de Farm´acia da Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira Portugal

Bruna Paim ,
Bruna Paim

Instituto Federal de Educa¸c˜ao, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia Farroupilha Alegrete, Campus Alegrete , Alegrete , Brazil

Jose Alberto Pereira ,
Jose Alberto Pereira

CIMO - Mountain Research Center, School of Agriculture, Polytechnic Institute of Braganca, Campus de Stª Apolonia , Braganca , Portugal

Susana Casal ,
Susana Casal

LAQV@REQUIMTE, Laboratorio de Bromatologia e Hidrologia, Faculdade de Farm´acia da Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira Portugal

Elsa Ramalhosa
Elsa Ramalhosa
Contact Elsa Ramalhosa

CIMO - Mountain Research Center, School of Agriculture, Polytechnic Institute of Braganca, Campus de Stª Apolonia , Braganca , Portugal

Published: 18.04.2018.

Volume 7, Issue 1 (2018)

pp. 52-68;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/7.1.2018.a5

Abstract

Osmotic dehydration of chestnut slices in sucrose was optimized for the first time by Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Experiments were planned according to a three-factor central composite design (α=1.68), studying the influence of sucrose concentration, temperature and time, on the following parameters: volume ratio, water activity, color variation, weight reduction, solids gain, water loss and normalized moisture content, as well as total moisture, ash and fat contents. The experimental data was adequately fitted into second-order polynomial models with coefficients of determination (R2 ) from 0.716 to 0.976, adjusted-R2 values from 0.460 to 0.954, and non-significant lacks of fit. The optimal osmotic dehydration process conditions for maximum water loss and minimum solids gain and color variation were determined by the “Response Optimizer” option: 83% sucrose concentration, 20 °C and 9.2 hours. Thus, the best operational conditions corresponded to high sugar concentration and low temperature, improving energy saving and decreasing the process costs.

Keywords

References

1.
Ajandouz E, Desseaux V, Tazi S, Puigserver A. Effects of temperature and pH on the kinetics of caramelisation, protein cross-linking and Maillard reactions in aqueous model systems. Food Chemistry. 2008;(3):1244–52.
2.
Andrés-Bello A, Barreto-Palacios V, García-Segovia P, Mir-Bel J, Martínez-Monzó J. Effect of pH on color and texture of food products. Food Engineering Reviews. 2013;(3):158–70.
3.
Anjum M, Tasadduq I, Alsultan K. Response surface methodology: a neural network approach. European Journal of Operational Research. 1997;(1):65–73.
4.
Appel L, Angell S, Cobb L, Limper H, Nelson D, Samet J, et al. Population-wide sodium reduction: the bumpy road from evidence to policy. Annals of Epidemiology. 2012;(6):417–25.
5.
Official Methods of Analysis. 1995;
6.
Atares L, Gallagher M, Oliveira F. Process conditions effect on the quality of banana osmotically dehydrated. Journal of Food Engineering. 2011;(4):401–8.
7.
Azarpazhooh E, Ramaswamy H. Modeling and optimization of microwave osmotic dehydration of apple cylinders under continuous-flow spray mode processing conditions. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2012;(5):1486–501.
8.
Cao H, Zhang M, Mujumdar A, Du W, Sun J. Optimization of osmotic dehydration of kiwifruit. Drying Technology. 2006;(1):89–94.
9.
Cecchini M, Contini M, Massantini R, Monarca D, Moscetti R. Effects of controlled atmospheres and low temperature on storability of chestnuts manually and mechanically harvested. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 2011;(2–3):131–6.
10.
Changrue V, Orsat V, Raghavan G, Lyew D. Effect of osmotic dehydration on the dielectric properties of car-rots and strawberries. Journal of Food Engineering. 2008;(2):280–6.
11.
Chenlo F, Moreira R, Fernández-Herrero C, Vázquez G. Experimental results and modeling of the osmotic dehydration kinetics of chestnut with glucose solutions. Journal of Food Engineering. 2006;(3):324–34.
12.
Chenlo F, Moreira R, Fernández-Herrero C, Vázquez G. Mass transfer during osmotic dehydration of chestnut using sodium chloride solutions. Journal of Food Engineering. 2006;(2):164–73.
13.
Chenlo F, Moreira R, Fernández-Herrero C, Vázquez G. Osmotic dehydration of chestnut with sucrose: mass transfer processes and global kinetics modelling. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;(3):765–74.
14.
Contreras J, Smyrl T. An evaluation of osmotic concentration of apple rings using corn syrup solids solutions. Canadian Institute of Food Science and. Technology Journal-journal De L Institut Canadien De Science Et Technologie Alimentaires. 1981;(4):310–4.
15.
Delgado T, Pereira J, Baptista P, Casal S, Ramalhosa E. Shell’s influence on drying kinetics, color and volumetric shrinkage of Castanea sativa Mill. fruits. Food Research International. 2014;426–35.
16.
Derossi A, Severini C, Del Mastro A, De Pilli T. Study and optimization of osmotic dehydration of cherry tomatoes in complex solution by response surface methodology and desirability approach. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2015;(2, 1):641–8.
17.
Eren I, Kaymak-Ertekin F. Optimization of osmotic dehydration of potato using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;(1):344–52.
18.
Dados estatísticos. 2014;
19.
Kaymak-Ertekin F, Sultanoglu M. Modelling of mass transfer during osmotic dehydration of apples. Journal of Food Engineering. 2000;(4):243–50.
20.
Kim M. Osmotic concentration of apples and its effect on browning reaction during air dehydration. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition. 1990;(2):121–6.
21.
Koocheki A, Azarpazhooh E. Evaluation of mass exchange during osmotic dehydration of plum using response surface methodology. International Journal of Food Properties. 2010;(1):155–66.
22.
Lazarides H, Gekas V, Mavroudis N. Apparent mass diffusivities in fruit and vegetable tissues undergoing osmotic processing. Journal of Food Engineering. 1997;(3):315–24.
23.
Lee JS, Tham H, Wong C. Osmotic dehydration of Kappaphycus alvarezii. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2014;(2):1063–70.
24.
Lerici C, Pinnavaia G, Rosa M, Bartolucci L. Osmotic dehydration of fruit -influence of osmotic agents on drying behavior and product quality. Journal of Food Science. 1985;(5):1217–9.
25.
Moreira R, Chenlo F, Chaguri L, Fernandes C. Water absorption, texture, and color kinetics of air-dried chestnuts during rehydration. Journal of Food Engineering. 2008;(4):584–94.
26.
Moreira R, Chenlo F, Chaguri L, Oliveira H. Drying of chestnuts (Castanea sativa Mill.) after osmotic dehydration with sucrose and glucose solutions. Drying Technology. 2007;(11):1837–45.
27.
Moreira R, Chenlo F, Chaguri L, Vazquez G. Air drying and colour characteristics of chestnuts pre-submitted to os-motic dehydration with sodium chloride. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2011;(C2):109–15.
28.
Moreira R, Chenlo F, Torres M, Vázquez G. Effect of stirring in the osmotic dehydration of chestnut using glycerol solutions. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2007;(9):1507–14.
29.
Moreira R, Chenlo F, Chaguri L, Mayor L. Analysis of chestnut cellular tissue during osmotic dehydration, air drying, and rehydration processes. Drying Technology. 2011;(1):10–8.
30.
Noshad M, Mohebbi M, Shahidi F, Mortazavi S. Multi-objective optimization of osmotic-ultrasonic pretreatments and hot-air drying of quince using response surface methodology. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2012;(6):2098–110.
31.
Ozdemir M, Ozen B, Dock L, Floros J. Optimization of osmotic dehydration of diced green peppers by response surface methodology. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2008;(10):2044–50.
32.
Park K, Bin A, Brod F, Park T. Osmotic dehydration kinetics of pear D’anjou (Pyrus communis L. Journal of Food Engineering. 2002;(3):293–8.
33.
Pereda J, Rodríguez M, Álvarez L, Sanz M, Minguillón G, Perales L, et al. 2005;
34.
Rastogi N, Raghavarao K, Niranjan K. Mass transfer during osmotic dehydration of banana: Fickian diffusion in cylindrical configuration. Journal of Food Engineering. 1997;(4):86–86.
35.
Rastogi N, Raghavarao K, Niranjan K, Knorr D. Recent developments in osmotic dehydration: methods to enhance mass transfer. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2002;(2):48–59.
36.
Rodrigues S, Fernandes F. Dehydration of melons in a ternary system followed by air-drying. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;(2):678–87.
37.
Sacchetti G, Gianotti A, Dalla Rosa M. Sucrose-salt combined effects on mass transfer kinetics and product acceptability. study on apple osmotic treatments. Journal of Food Engineering. 2001;(2–3):163–73.
38.
Shi J, Le Maguer M. Osmotic dehydration of foods: mass transfer and modeling aspects. Food Reviews International. 2002;(4):305–35.
39.
Singh B, Kumar A, Gupta A. Study of mass transfer kinetics and effective diffusivity during osmotic dehydration of carrot cubes. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;(2):471–80.
40.
Tonon R, Baroni A, Hubinger M. Osmotic dehydration of tomato in ternary solutions: influence of process variables on mass transfer kinetics and an evaluation of the retention of carotenoids. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;(4):509–17.
41.
Uddin M, Ainsworth P, Ibanoglu S. Evaluation of mass exchange during osmotic dehydration of carrots using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Engineering. 2004;(4):473–7.
42.
Vasconcelos J, Andrade S, Maciel M, Guerra N, Vasconcelos M. Osmotic dehydration of the Indian fig (Opuntia ficus indica) with binary and ternary solutions. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2012;(11):2359–65.
43.
Yadav B, Yadav R, Jatain M. Optimization of osmotic dehydration conditions of peach slices in sucrose solution using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Science and Technol. 2012;

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by