The purpose of the study was to identify the motivations and the barriers that stakeholders face regarding Short Food Supply Chains (SFSC). Two focus groups with stakeholders of the agricultural sector and SFSC were conducted in the Netherlands and Switzerland. A first fundamental topic addressed by participants was the one related to the definition of SFSC, which is far from consensual,"short" being often associated and sometimes confused with local, direct, small, fair, ecological, fresh, healthy, etc. However, a series of positive and negative factors influencing SFSC development, and the involvement of agri-food stakeholders were identified. On the one hand, the unique relationship built through direct contact between producers and consumers, the fair distribution of value added in the chain that producers can find in engaging in SFSC, the increasing number of SFSC initiatives, the farm resilience, and territorial strategies that are being developed seem to be the most positive aspects, that can explain the trends moving towards these types of distribution channel. On the other hand, many hindering factors were also identified, such as weak communication and marketing capacity of producers, and a lack of efficiency and cooperation between peers. The fierce competition of conventional distribution, using green washing, together with a profusion of labels, price issues, and unsuitable standards were mentioned as the main threats faced by SFSC actors.
Augère-Granier ML. Short food supply chains and local food systems in the EU. European Parliamentary Research Service. 2016;586650.
2.
Bentsen K, Pedersen P. Consumers in local food markets: from adoption to market co-creation? British Food Journal. 2020;(3):1083–102.
3.
Boutry O, Ferru M. Apports de la méthode mixte pour une analyse globale de la durabilité des circuits courts. Développement Durable et Territoires. 2016;(2).
4.
Chiffoleau Y, Dourian T. Sustainable Food Supply Chains: Is Shortening the Answer? A Literature Review for a Research and Innovation Agenda. Sustainability. 2020;(23):9831.
5.
Chiffoleau Y, Prevost B. Les circuits courts, des innovations sociales pour une alimentation durable dans les territoires. Norois. 2012;(224):7–20.
6.
De Bernardi P, Tirabeni L. Alternative food networks: sustainable business models for anti-consumption food cultures. British Food Journal. 2018;(8):1776–91.
7.
Eip-Agri. Our % 20Insights / The % 20path % 20forward % 20for % 20European % 20grocery % 20retailers / Disruption-and-Uncertainty-The-Stateof -Grocery -Retail -2021 -Europe -final . pdf European Commission. 2015;
8.
July. 2022;
9.
Short Food Supply Chains as drivers of sustainable development: Evidence Document. 2013;
10.
Giampietri E, Finco A, Giudice T. Exploring consumers’ behaviour towards short food supply chains. British Food Journal. 2016;(3):618–31.
11.
Hekkert M, Negro S. Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2009;(4):584–94.
12.
Hyland J, Crehan P, Colantuono F, Macken-Walsh Á. The Significance of Short Food Supply Chains: Trends and Bottlenecks from the SKIN Thematic Network. Studies in Agricultural Economics. 2019;(2):59–66.
13.
Jarzcebowski S, Bourlakis M, Bezat-Jarzcebowska A. Short Food Supply Chains (SFSC) as Local and Sustainable Systems. Sustainability. 2020;(11):4715.
14.
Kasemodel MG, Makishi F, Souza R, Silva VL. Following the trail of crumbs: A bibliometric study on consumer behavior in the Food Science and Technology field. International Journal of Food Studies. 2016;(1).
15.
Kirwan J. Alternative Strategies in the UK Agro-Food System: Interrogating the Alterity of Farmers. Markets Sociologia Ruralis. 2004;(4):395–415.
16.
Kitzinger J. Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995;299–302.
17.
Kneafsey M, Venn L, Schmutz U, Balázs B, Trenchard L, Eyden-Wood P, et al. Short food supply chains and local food systems in the EU: A state of play of their socio-economic characteristics. 2013;
18.
Malak-Rawlikowska A, Majewski E, Wcas A, Borgen S, Csillag P, Donati M, et al. Measuring the Economic. 2019;(15):4004.
19.
Massar B. Sustainable food transition through collaborative short food supply chains: A strategic collective system building approach for strengthening the innovation ecosystem of short food supply chains in the Netherlands. 2019;
20.
Morgan D, Krueger R. Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. 1993;3–19.
21.
Nunes R, Silva V, Kasemodel M, Polizer Y, Saes M, Fávaro-Trindade C. Assessing global changing food patterns: A country-level analysis on the consumption of food products with health and wellness claims. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;274.
22.
Renting H, Marsden T, Banks J. Understanding Alternative Food Networks: Exploring the Role of Short Food Supply Chains in Rural Development. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 2003;(3):393–411.
23.
Ripoll-Bosch O, Díez-Unquera B, Ruiz R, Villalba D, Molina E, Joy M, et al. An integrated sustainability assessment of mediterranean sheep farms with different degrees of intensification. Agricultural Systems. 2012;(1):46–56.
24.
Seyfang G. Avoiding Asda? Exploring consumer motivations in local organic good networks. Local Environment. 2007;(1):187–201.
25.
July. 2022;
26.
Silva V, Sereno A, Sobral P. Food Industry and Processing Technology: On Time to Harmonize Technology and Social Drivers. Food Engineering Reviews. 2018;1–13.
27.
Simons L, Nijhof A. Changing the Game. 2020;
28.
Sonnino R. The new geography of food security: Exploring the potential of urban food strategies. The Geographical Journal. 2016;(2):190–200.
29.
Korte T, Keten. National Short Chain Collaboration -Provinces, Ministry of Agriculture. 2020;
30.
Vittersø G, Torjusen H, Laitala K, Tocco B, Biasini B, Csillag P, et al. Short food supply chains and their contributions to sustainability: Participants’ views and perceptions from 12 european cases. Sustainability. 2019;11–7.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
