More articles from Volume 7, Issue 1, 2018
Food oral processing in humans: links between physiological parameters, release of flavour stimuli and flavour perception of food
Examination of optimum test conditions for a 3-point bending and cutting test to evaluate sound emission of wafer during deformation
Extraction and characterisation of cellulose nanocrystals from pineapple peel
Quality assessment and shelf life modeling of pulsed electric field pretreated osmodehydrofrozen kiwifruit slices
Optimization of osmotic dehydration of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) slices using Response Surface Methodology
Energy pattern and conservations of condiment produced from soybean (Glycine max)
Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Technology, University of Ibadan , Ibadan , Nigeria
Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Technology, University of Ibadan , Ibadan , Nigeria
Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Technology, University of Ibadan , Ibadan , Nigeria
Published: 18.04.2018.
Volume 7, Issue 1 (2018)
pp. 111-119;
Abstract
Energy being one of the largest operating expenses in most organizations especially manufacturing and processing industries leading to considerable scope for energy conservation and hence cost. Information on energy utilization and conservation pattern were obtained based on time taken, number of person involved and sources of energy using standard energy equations. A total of 445.40 ± 17.32MJkg−1 where thermal energy (420MJ ≈ 94%) and manual energy (25.40MJ ≈ 6%) were the only forms of energy used during production process. Conservation approach I resulted in mean energy of 72.08 ± 1.73MJkg−1 where electrical energy, manual energy and thermal energy accounted for 1.75MJ (3%) 7.34MJ (10%) and 62.99MJ (87%) respectively. Conservation approach II reduced the energy further to 57.24 ± 1.73MJkg−1 as the operation was thermal energy dependent, followed by manual and electrical energy with energy values of 48.13, 7.33 and 1.78MJ equivalent to 84.10%, 12.80% and 3.10% accordingly. Conclusively, traditional method of processing utilized highest energy (445.40MJ) followed by conservation approach I (72.08MJ) and conservation approach II (57.24MJ) was least in energy demand. Conservation approach II permits energy conservation to be 87% as compared with traditional method.
Keywords
References
Citation
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.