Effect of pre-treatments on solar drying kinetics of red seedless grapes (cv. Monukka)

Ines N. Ramos ,
Ines N. Ramos

CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Quımica Fina – Laborat´orio Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa/Porto Portugal

Teresa R.S. Brandao ,
Teresa R.S. Brandao

CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Quımica Fina – Laborat´orio Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa/Porto Portugal

Cristina L.M. Silva
Cristina L.M. Silva
Contact Cristina L.M. Silva

CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Quımica Fina – Laborat´orio Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa/Porto Portugal

Published: 18.10.2014.

Volume 3, Issue 2 (2014)

pp. 239-247;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/3.2.2014.a9

Abstract

Two different pre-treatments were applied to grapes prior to drying in a mixed mode solar dryer. Grapes were blanched in water and in a 0.1% sunflower oil water emulsion, both at 99◦C and for approximately 15 seconds. Several models were tested to fit the experimental data of drying curves but the normalized Newton model gave the best fit results. Samples blanched in hot water or in the 0.1% edible oil emulsion had faster drying rates than untreated samples. Contrary to what was expected, pre-treating with the 0.1% edible oil emulsion did not increase the drying rate to a higher extent than blanching. Pre-treatments did not give a noteworthy difference in the total drying time. However, they had an important role in accelerating initial drying rates, thus preventing moulds and bacterial growth and consequently increasing farmers’ income

Keywords

References

1.
Riva M, Peri C. Kinetics of sun and 394 air drying of different varieties of seedless 395 grapes. Journal Of Food Technology. 1986;(2):396–199.
2.
Yaldiz O, Ertekin C, Uzun H. 435 Mathematical modeling of thin layer solar 436 drying of sultana grapes. Energy. 2001;(5):457–65.
3.
4.
Nutrition Research. (8):511–9.
5.
Williamson G, Carughi A. Polyphe-431 nol content and health benefits of raisins. 2010;
6.
Viticulture -practices. Adelaide: Wineti-429 tles.
7.
Whiting J. Harvesting and drying of 427 grapes. 1992;
8.
Vázquez G, Chenlo F, Moreira R. Desorption isotherms 421 of muscatel and aledo grapes, and the 422 influence of pretreatments on muscatel 423 isotherms. Journal of Food Engineering. 1999;(4):30–8.
9.
10.
Togrul I, Pehlivan D. Modelling 415 of thin layer drying kinetics of some fruits 416 under open-air sun drying process. Jour-417 nal of Food Engineering. 2004;(3):413–25.
11.
Hui. Processing Fruits: Science and 411 Technology -Major Processed Products 412. :235–63.
12.
Striegler R, Berg G, Morris J. Raisin production and processing 409. 1996;
13.
El-Sebaii A, Aboul-Enein S, Ramadan M, El-Gohary H. Em-403 pirical correlations for drying kinetics of 404 some fruits and vegetables. Energy. 2002;(9):845–59.
14.
397 Saravacos G, Marousis S, Raouzeos G. Effect of ethyl oleate on the rate 399 of air-drying of foods. Journal of Food En-400 gineering. 1988;(4):263–70.
15.
16.
Lahsasni S, Kouhila M, Mahrouz M, Jaouhari J. Drying kinetics of. 2004;
17.
Grncarevic M, Radler F. A review of 347 the surface lipids of grapes and their im-348 portance in the drying process. American 349 Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 1971;(2):80–6.
18.
Fuller R. Solar drying of horticul-343 tural produce: present practice and future 344 prospects. Postharvest News and Informa-345 tion. 1993;(3).
19.
Doymaz I. Sun drying of figs: an experi-339 mental study. Journal of Food Engineering. 2005;(4):403–7.
20.
Box G, Hunter W, Hunter J. Statistics for experimenters an in-335 troduction to design, data analysis and 336 model building john wiley and sons. New. 1978;334.
21.
Escher B, Hallstrom H, Meffert. :43–54.
22.
Bizot H. Using the ’GAB’model to con-328 struct sorption isotherms. 1983;
23.
Bennamoun L, Belhamri A. Journal of Food Engineer-325 ing. 2003;(2–3):466–7.
24.
25.
Bala B, Woods J. Simulation of 319 the indirect natural-convection solar drying 320 of rough rice. Solar Energy. 1994;(3):259–66.
26.
314 Uvas para passas -estudo da sua produção. :315.
27.
Araújo F, Pascoal M, Candeias M, Dias J, Carvalho B, Machado B. 1994;
28.
Aoac. Official methods of analysis. 2000;17.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by