PhD competences of food studies

Chelo Gonzalez-Martinez ,
Chelo Gonzalez-Martinez
Contact Chelo Gonzalez-Martinez

Food Technology Department, Universitat Politècnica de València , Valencia , Spain

Cristina L.M. Silva ,
Cristina L.M. Silva

CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Qu´ımica Fina, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Centro Regional do Porto da, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa Portugal

Rui Costa
Rui Costa

Instituto Polit´ecnico de Coimbra, Escola Superior Agr´aria , Coimbra , Portugal

Published: 18.10.2014.

Volume 3, Issue 2 (2014)

pp. 136-144;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/3.2.2014.a1

Abstract

In European Higher Education, learning outcomes and competences have been used sometimes with different meanings and sometimes with the same meaning. But both terms have been more commonly used to refer to knowledge, understanding and abilities a student must demonstrate at the end of a learning experience. Their use is a consequence of the paradigm shift of the Bologna Process to a learner centered education environment. The definition of standards of competences (or learning outcomes) for the PhD degree is thus a need for the quality assurance of this degree. In this work, subject-specific and generic competences for the PhD in Food Science and Technology and their alignment with the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) level descriptors for quality assurance purposes have been identified.

Keywords

References

1.
Adam S. Report for United Kingdom Bologna Seminar. 2004;1–2.
2.
Cyranoski D, Gilbert N, Ledford H, Nayar A, Yahia M. The PHD factory. Nature. 2011;(7343):276–9.
3.
Education and Culture The European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning (EQF). 2008;
4.
Fiske P. What is a phd really worth? Nature. 2011;(7343):381.
5.
Harden R. Developments in outcomebased education. Medical Teacher. 2002;(2):117–20.
6.
Kennedy D, Hyland A, Ryan N. EUA Bologna Handbook -Making Bologna Work. 2 nd supplement (C3.4-1, 1-30). 2006;
7.
Doctoral studies in europe: excellence in researcher training. 2007;
8.
Taylor M. Reform the phd system or close it down. Nature. 2011;(7343):261.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by