More articles from Volume 4, Issue 2, 2015
Identifying most important skills for PhD students in Food Science and Technology: a comparison between industry and academic stakeholders
Probiotic fermented almond “milk” as an alternative to cow-milk yoghurt
Simple and double microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus with chitosan using spray drying
Food innovation and entrepreneurship in higher education: a case study
Qualifications of Food Science and Technology/Engineering professionals at the entrance in the job market
Teaching microbiological food safety through case studies
,
Florence Dubois-Brissonnet
,
Laurent Guillier
Murielle Naïtali
Abstract
References
1.
Baranyi J, Roberts TA. A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial growth in food. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1994;23(3–4):277–94.
2.
Baranyi J, Tamplin M. Combase: a common database on microbial responses to food environments. Journal of Food Protection. 2004;(9).
3.
Carlin F, Albagnac C, Rida A, Guinebretière MH, Couvert O, Nguyen-the C. Variation of cardinal growth parameters and growth limits according to phylogenetic affiliation in the Bacillus cereus Group. Consequences for risk assessment. Food Microbiology. 2013;33(1):69–76.
4.
Couvert O, Gaillard S, Savy N, Mafart P, Leguérinel I. Survival curves of heated bacterial spores: effect of environmental factors on Weibull parameters. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2005;101(1):73–81.
5.
Delhalle L, Daube G, Adolphe Y, Crevecoeur S, Clinquart A. A review of growth models in predictive microbiology to ensure food safety. Biotechnologie Agronomie Societe et Environnement. 2012;(3):369–81.
6.
Geeraerd AH, Valdramidis VP, Van Impe JF. GInaFiT, a freeware tool to assess non-log-linear microbial survivor curves. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2005;102(1):95–105.
7.
Itie-Hafez S, Danan C. 2014;35–7.
8.
James SJ, Evans J, James C. A review of the performance of domestic refrigerators. Journal of Food Engineering. 2008;87(1):2–10.
9.
Lagendijk E, Assere A, Derens E, Carpentier B. Domestic refrigeration practices with emphasis on hygiene: analysis of a survey and consumer recommendations. Journal of Food Protection. 2008;(9):1898–904.
10.
McClure PJ, de W. Blackburn C, Cole MB, Curtis PS, Jones JE, Legan JD, et al. Modelling the growth, survival and death of microorganisms in foods: the UK Food Micromodel approach. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1994;23(3–4):265–75.
11.
MEMBRE J, LEPORQ B, VIALETTE M, METTLER E, PERRIER L, THUAULT D, et al. Temperature effect on bacterial growth rate: quantitative microbiology approach including cardinal values and variability estimates to perform growth simulations on/in food. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2005;100(1–3):179–86.
12.
Ratkowsky D, Olley J, Mcmeekin T, Ball A. Relationship between temperature and growth-rate of bacterial cultures. Journal of Bacteriology. 1982;(1):1–5.
13.
Ross T, Dalgaard P. Modeling microbial responses in food. 2004;63–150.
14.
Rosso L, Bajard S, Flandrois J, Lahellec C, Fournaud J, Veit P. Differential growth of listeria monocytogenes at 4 and 8 degrees c: consequences for the shelf life of chilled products. Journal of Food Protection. 1996;(9):944–9.
15.
Rosso L, Lobry JR, Flandrois JP. An Unexpected Correlation between Cardinal Temperatures of Microbial Growth Highlighted by a New Model. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1993;162(4):447–63.
16.
Tenenhaus-Aziza F, Ellouze M. Software for predictive microbiology and risk assessment: A description and comparison of tools presented at the ICPMF8 Software Fair. Food Microbiology. 2015;45:290–9.
17.
Zwietering M, Jongenburger I, Rombouts F, Van’t Riet K. Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Applied and environmental microbiology. 1990;(6):1875–81.
Citation
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
Google scholar:
See link
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
