More articles from Volume 5, Issue 2, 2016
Effect of roasting regime on phytochemical properties of Senna occidentalis seeds
Reproducibility and correlation between meat shear force measurements by Warner-Bratzler machine and a texturometer
Solubility of Stevioside and Rebaudioside A in water, ethanol and their binary mixtures
Modeling the kinetics of peroxidase inactivation, colour and texture changes of Portuguese cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. costata DC) during UV-C light and heat blanching
Assessment of nutritional composition in elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius Dennst- Nicolson) cultivars
Reproducibility and correlation between meat shear force measurements by Warner-Bratzler machine and a texturometer
,
Lucas Arantes-Pereira
,
Flávia C. Vargas
,
Júlio C.C. Balieiro
,
Ana Monica Q.B. Bittante
Paulo J.A. Sobral
Abstract
References
1.
References A. Research guidelines for cookery, sensory evaluation and instrumental tenderness measurements of fresh meat. 2015;(2).
2.
Aoac. Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists international. 2011;(18).
3.
Belew JB, Brooks JC, McKenna DR, Savell JW. Warner–Bratzler shear evaluations of 40 bovine muscles. Meat Science. 2003;64(4):507–12.
4.
Bourne M. Food texture and viscosity: concept and measurement. 2002;
5.
Carmack CF, Kastner CL, Dikeman ME, Schwenke JR, García Zepeda CM. Sensory evaluation of beef-flavor-intensity, tenderness, and juiciness among major muscles. Meat Science. 1995;39(1):143–7.
6.
de Huidobro FR, Miguel E, Blázquez B, Onega E. A comparison between two methods (Warner–Bratzler and texture profile analysis) for testing either raw meat or cooked meat. Meat Science. 2005;69(3):527–36.
7.
Font-i-Furnols M, Guerrero L. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat Science. 2014;98(3):361–71.
8.
Franco D, Lorenzo JM. Effect of muscle and intensity of finishing diet on meat quality of foals slaughtered at 15months. Meat Science. 2014;96(1):327–34.
9.
Gama LT, Bressan MC, Rodrigues EC, Rossato LV, Moreira OC, Alves SP, et al. Heterosis for meat quality and fatty acid profiles in crosses among Bos indicus and Bos taurus finished on pasture or grain. Meat Science. 2013;93(1):98–104.
10.
Hildrum KI, Rødbotten R, Høy M, Berg J, Narum B, Wold JP. Classification of different bovine muscles according to sensory characteristics and Warner Bratzler shear force. Meat Science. 2009;83(2):302–7.
11.
Hopkins DL, Lamb TA, Kerr MJ, van de Ven RJ. The interrelationship between sensory tenderness and shear force measured by the G2 Tenderometer and a Lloyd texture analyser fitted with a Warner–Bratzler head. Meat Science. 2013;93(4):838–42.
12.
Koohmaraie M, Kent MP, Shackelford SD, Veiseth E, Wheeler TL. Meat tenderness and muscle growth: is there any relationship? Meat Science. 2002;62(3):345–52.
13.
Lambe NR, Navajas EA, Bünger L, Fisher AV, Roehe R, Simm G. Prediction of lamb carcass composition and meat quality using combinations of post-mortem measurements. Meat Science. 2009;81(4):711–9.
14.
Latorre MA, Lázaro R, Gracia MI, Nieto M, Mateos GG. Effect of sex and terminal sire genotype on performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of pigs slaughtered at 117 kg body weight. Meat Science. 2003;65(4):1369–77.
15.
Lorenzen CL, Calkins CR, Green MD, Miller RK, Morgan JB, Wasser BE. Efficacy of performing Warner–Bratzler and slice shear force on the same beef steak following rapid cooking. Meat Science. 2010;85(4):792–4.
16.
Obuz E, Dikeman ME, Grobbel JP, Stephens JW, Loughin TM. Beef longissimus lumborum, biceps femoris, and deep pectoralis Warner–Bratzler shear force is affected differently by endpoint temperature, cooking method, and USDA quality grade. Meat Science. 2004;68(2):243–8.
17.
Otremba M, Dikeman M, Milliken G, Stroda S, Unruh J, Chambers E. Interrelationships among evaluations of beef longissimus and semitendinosus muscle tenderness by Warner-Bratzler shear force, a descriptive-texture profile sensory panel, and a descriptive attribute sensory panel. Journal of Animal Science. 1999;(4):865–73.
18.
Palka K. The influence of post-mortem ageing and roasting on the microstructure, texture and collagen solubility of bovine semitendinosus muscle. Meat Science. 2003;64(2):191–8.
19.
Pinto M, Ponsano E, Almeida. Shear blade thickness in the instrumental evaluation of meat texture. 2010;(6):1405–10.
20.
RAMIREZ J. Effect of selection for growth rate on biochemical, quality and texture characteristics of meat from rabbits. Meat Science. 2004;67(4):617–24.
21.
Rees MP, Trout GR, Warner RD. Tenderness, ageing rate and meat quality of pork M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum after accelerated boning. Meat Science. 2002;60(2):113–24.
22.
Rhee M, Wheeler T, Shackelford S, Koohmaraie M. Variation in palatability and biochemical traits within and among eleven beef muscles. Journal of Animal Science. 2004;(2):534–50.
23.
Rosa AF, Poleti MD, Balieiro JCC, César MC, Sobral PJA. Effects of modified atmosphere, associated with masterpack transport packaging, and refrigerated storage time on the quality characteristics of pork loin cuts. International Journal of Food Studies. 2013;2(2).
24.
Shackelford S, Wheeler T, Koohmaraie M. Relationship between shear force and trained sensory panel tenderness ratings of 10 major muscles from Bos-indicus and Bos-taurus cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 1995;(11):3333–40.
25.
Silva M, Contreras-Castillo C, Ortega M, E. Effect of cooking on the quality of beef Semitendinosus muscle. Ciencia e Tecnologia de Alimentos. 2007;(3):441–5.
26.
Stolowski GD, Baird BE, Miller RK, Savell JW, Sams AR, Taylor JF, et al. Factors influencing the variation in tenderness of seven major beef muscles from three Angus and Brahman breed crosses. Meat Science. 2006;73(3):475–83.
27.
van der Wal PG, Bolink AH, Merkus GSM. Differences in quality characteristics of normal, PSE and DFD pork. Meat Science. 1988;24(1):79–84.
28.
Vergara H, Gallego L. Effect of electrical stunning on meat quality of lamb. Meat Science. 2000;56(4):345–9.
29.
Wheeler TL, Shackelford SD, Koohmaraie M. Sampling, cooking, and coring effects on Warner-Bratzler shear force values in beef. Journal of Animal Science. 1996;74(7):1553.
30.
Wheeler T, Shackelford S, Johnson L, Miller M, Miller R, Koohmaraie M. A comparison of warner-bratzler shear force assessment within and among institutions. Journal of Animal Science. 1997;(9):2423–32.
31.
Wheeler T, Shackelford S, Koohmaraie M. Standardizing collection and interpretation of warnerbratzler shear force and sensory tenderness data. 1997;68–77.
32.
Wyrwisz J, Poltorak A, Zalewska M, Zaremba R, Wierzbicka A. Analysis of relationship between basic composition, PH, and physical properties of selected bovine muscles. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy. 2012;(3):403–9.
33.
Xiong R, Cavitt L, Meullenet J, Owens C. Comparison of allokramer, warner-bratzler and razor blade shears for predicting sensory tenderness of broiler breast meat. Journal of Texture Studies. 2006;(2):179–99.
34.
Yancey JWS, Wharton MD, Apple JK. Cookery method and end-point temperature can affect the Warner–Bratzler shear force, cooking loss, and internal cooked color of beef longissimus steaks. Meat Science. 2011;88(1):1–7.
35.
Yarmand MS, Nikmaram P, Emam Djomeh Z, Homayouni A. Microstructural and mechanical properties of camel longissimus dorsi muscle during roasting, braising and microwave heating. Meat Science. 2013;95(2):419–24.
Citation
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
Google scholar:
See link
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
