Are we doing our homework? An analysis of food engineering education in Brazil

Vivian-Lara Silva ,
Vivian-Lara Silva
Fausto Makishi ,
Fausto Makishi
Marcus Magossi ,
Marcus Magossi
Izabel Cristina Freitas Moraes ,
Izabel Cristina Freitas Moraes
Carmen Silvia Fávaro Trindade ,
Carmen Silvia Fávaro Trindade
Paulo José Do Amaral Sobral
Paulo José Do Amaral Sobral

Published: 01.12.2017.

Volume 7, Issue 2 (2018)

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs.v7i2.396

Abstract

What is the profile of Food Engineering education in Brazil? Are we following the contemporary professional renewal trend? Driven by these questions, the present study analyzed data regarding 21 academic courses,which represent approximately 22% of the total bachelor’s degree in food engineering courses offered in the country. Samples were defined considering a Brazilian annual ranking of undergraduate programs: very good (four stars) and excellent (five stars). Next, information was recovered from both the Brazilian Ministry of Education and institutional homepages of each analyzed program. The results suggest that food engineering programs exhibit relative identity, naturally due to their history and the path of each program and their faculty, shaping particularities in how fields of knowledge are constituted, in addition to their representativeness in the total workload of the program. However, initial analysis is suggestive regarding understanding that Brazil is not properly doing its homework, based on global movement, concerning food engineering education. The need to rethink Brazilian technical education, without culminating in additional workload, is emphasized, not only regarding new materials and technologies for learning and teaching, but also in terms of bringing a human and market approach. The achievement of this complex goal seems to be provided by the encouragement of student associations, transversal learning processes, and learning experiences outside the classroom as a means of improving undergraduate programs and human resources.

References

1.
Unicamp -Universidade. Estadual de Campinas 1967 Campinas-SP 115 UFV -Universidade Federal de Viçosa 1975 Viçosa-MG 60 UFC -Universidade Federal do Ceará 1976 Fortaleza-CE 100 UFPB -Universidade Federal da Paraíba. 1976;
2.
Furg -Universidade. Federal do Rio Grande. 1979;
3.
Ufsc -Universidade. 1983;30.
4.
Rio Preto-SP FENVA -Faculdade de Engenharia de Varginha 1984 Varginha-MG 30.
5.
Instituto Mauá 1986 S. C. do Sul-SP 40 UNIMEP -Metodista de Piracicaba. 1988;
6.
1989;
7.
Fundo 1998 Passo Fundo-RS NF UFG -Universidade Federal de Goiás 1999 Goiânia-GO 60 UESB -Universidade Estadual do. 1999;
8.
Pirassununga-SP. 2001;
9.
Ufla -Universidade. Federal de Lavras 2003 Lavras-MG 100 UFRJ -Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. RJ. 2004;
10.
11.
Source: The authors, based on information obtained from the Brazilian Ministry of Education (MEC, 2016) References Abramovay, R. 1992;
12.
Anpocs /Edunicamp-São, Paulo-Campinas.
13.
Aguilera JM. Seligman lecture 2005 food product engineering: building the right structures. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2006;86(8):1147–55.
14.
Alves GR, Restivo MT, da Silva JB. Special issue on engineering education: challenges for innovation. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2015;40(5):451–8.
15.
Barbosa-Canovas G, Ibarz A. 2002;
16.
Batalha M, Marchesini M, Costa M, Bergamaschi M, Rinaldi R, Moura T. Recursos humanos e agronegócio: a evolução do perfil profissional. 2005;
17.
Berman J, Ritchie L. Competencies of Undergraduate Business Students. Journal of Education for Business. 2006;81(4):205–9.
18.
Besterfield‐Sacre M, Cox MF, Borrego M, Beddoes K, Zhu J. Changing Engineering Education: Views of U.S. Faculty, Chairs, and Deans. Journal of Engineering Education. 2014;103(2):193–219.
19.
Borrego M, Bernhard J. The Emergence of Engineering Education Research as an Internationally Connected Field of Inquiry. Journal of Engineering Education. 2011;100(1):14–47.
20.
Bulmer-Thomas V. The economic history of latin america since independence. 2003;
21.
Costa R, Možina SS, Pittia P. The Regulation of Food Science and Technology Professions in Europe. International Journal of Food Studies. 2014;3(1).
22.
Dillon J, Rickinson M, Teamey K, Morris M, Choi M, Sanders D, et al. The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the uk and elsewhere. School Science Review. 2006;(320):107–11.
23.
Eccles JS, Barber BL. Student Council, Volunteering, Basketball, or Marching Band. Journal of Adolescent Research. 1999;14(1):10–43.
24.
Flynn K, Bejarano B, Wahnstrom E, Echim C, Quintas M. Profile of currently employed european food scientists and technologists: education, experience and skills. International Journal of Food Studies. 2013;(2).
25.
Gair N. Outdoor education: theory and practice. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Guia do Estudante. 1997;3–19.
26.
Kasemodel MG, Makishi F, Souza R, Silva VL. Following the trail of crumbs: a bibliometric study on consumer behavior in the food science and technology field. International Journal of Food Studies. 2016;(1).
27.
Knight J. Internationalization Remodeled: Definition, Approaches, and Rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education. 2004;8(1):5–31.
28.
Kostaropoulos A. Food engineering within sciences of food. International Journal of Food Studies. 2012;(2).
29.
Loncin M. Food engineering: principals and selected applications. Food science and technology. 2012;
30.
Lucena J, Downey G, Jesiek B, Elber S. Competencies Beyond Countries: The Re‐Organization of Engineering Education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America. Journal of Engineering Education. 2008;97(4):433–47.
31.
Melsa J, Rajala S, Mohsen J. Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education. 2009;(3):209–209.
32.
Paisley K, Furman N, Sibthorp J, Gookin J. Student Learning in Outdoor Education: A Case Study from the National Outdoor Leadership School. Journal of Experiential Education. 2008;30(3):201–22.
33.
Roos YH, Fryer PJ, Knorr D, Schuchmann HP, Schroën K, Schutyser MAI, et al. Food Engineering at Multiple Scales: Case Studies, Challenges and the Future—A European Perspective. Food Engineering Reviews. 2015;8(2):91–115.
34.
Rychen D, Salganik L. Key competencies for a successful life and wellfunctioning society. 2003;
35.
Saguy IS, Cohen E. Food engineering: Attitudes and future outlook. Journal of Food Engineering. 2016;178:71–80.
36.
Saguy IS, Singh RP, Johnson T, Fryer PJ, Sastry SK. Challenges facing food engineering. Journal of Food Engineering. 2013;119(2):332–42.
37.
Silva VL, Sereno AM, do Amaral Sobral PJ. Food Industry and Processing Technology: On Time to Harmonize Technology and Social Drivers. Food Engineering Reviews. 2017;10(1):1–13.
38.
Skidmore T. Brazil: five centuries of change. 2009;
39.
Wood DF. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Problem based learning. BMJ. 2003;326(7384):328–30.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by