Are we doing our homework? An analysis of food engineering education in Brazil

Vivian-Lara Lara Silva ,
Vivian-Lara Lara Silva
Contact Vivian-Lara Lara Silva

Food Engineering Dept., Federal University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil

Fausto Makishi ,
Fausto Makishi

Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais , Montes Claros , Brazil

Marcus Magossi ,
Marcus Magossi

Food Engineering Dept., Federal University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil

Izabel Cristina Freitas Moraes ,
Izabel Cristina Freitas Moraes

Food Engineering Dept., Universidade de São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil

Carmen Silvia Favaro Trindade ,
Carmen Silvia Favaro Trindade

Food Engineering Dept., Federal University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil

Paulo Jose do Amaral Sobral
Paulo Jose do Amaral Sobral

Food Engineering Dept., Federal University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil

Published: 18.10.2018.

Volume 7, Issue 2 (2018)

pp. 1-16;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/7.2.2018.a1

Abstract

What is the profile of Food Engineering education in Brazil? Are we following the contemporary professional renewal trend? Driven by these questions, the present study analyzed data regarding 21 academic courses, which represent approximately 22% of the total bachelor’s degree in food engineering courses offered in the country. Samples were defined considering a Brazilian annual ranking of undergraduate programs: very good (four stars) and excellent (five stars). Next, information was recovered from both the Brazilian Ministry of Education and institutional homepages of each analyzed program. The results suggest that food engineering programs exhibit relative identity, naturally due to their history and the path of each program and their faculty, shaping particularities in how fields of knowledge are constituted, in addition to their representativeness in the total workload of the program. However, initial analysis is suggestive regarding understanding that Brazil is not properly doing its homework, based on global movement, concerning food engineering education. The need to rethink Brazilian technical education, without culminating in additional workload, is emphasized, not only regarding new materials and technologies for learning and teaching, but also in terms of bringing a human and market approach. The achievement of this complex goal seems to be provided by the encouragement of student associations, transversal learning processes, and learning experiences outside the classroom as a means of improving undergraduate programs and human resources.

Keywords

References

1.
Unicamp -Universidade. Estadual de Campinas 1967 Campinas-SP 115 UFV -Universidade Federal de Viçosa 1975 Viçosa-MG 60 UFC -Universidade Federal do Ceará 1976 Fortaleza-CE 100 UFPB -Universidade Federal da Paraíba. 1976;
2.
Furg -Universidade. Federal do Rio Grande. 1979;
3.
Ufsc -Universidade. Federal de Santa Catarina 1979 Florianópolis-SC 50 UNIFEB -Fundação Educacional de Barretos 1980 Barretos-SP 40. 1983;30.
4.
Rio Preto-SP FENVA -Faculdade de Engenharia de Varginha 1984 Varginha-MG 30.
5.
Instituto Mauá 1986 S. C. do Sul-SP 40 UNIMEP -Metodista de Piracicaba. 1988;
6.
Curitiba-PR 60 UFRRJ -Universidade Federal Rural 1991 Seropédica-RJ 60 do Rio de Janeiro UNISINOS -Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos 1992 São Leopoldo-RS 90 UFRGS -Universidade Federal. 1989;
7.
Fundo 1998 Passo Fundo-RS NF UFG -Universidade Federal de Goiás 1999 Goiânia-GO 60 UESB -Universidade Estadual do. 1999;
8.
Pirassununga-SP. 2001;
9.
Ufla -Universidade. Federal de Lavras 2003 Lavras-MG 100 UFRJ -Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. RJ. 2004;
10.
Federal Goiano 2007 Rio Verde-GO 50.
11.
Paradigmas do capitalismo agrário em questão-hucitec. 1992;
12.
Anpocs /Edunicamp-São, Paulo-Campinas.
13.
Aguilera J. Seligman lecture 2005 -food product engineering: building the right structures. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2006;(8):1147–55.
14.
Alves G, Restivo M, Da Silva J. Special issue on engineering education: challenges for innovation. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2015;(5):451–8.
15.
Barbosa-Canovas G, Ibarz A. Unit operations in food engineering. 2002;
16.
Batalha M, Marchesini M, Costa M, Bergamaschi M, Rinaldi R, Moura T. Recursos humanos e agronegócio: a evolução do perfil profissional. 2005;
17.
Berman J, Ritchie L. Competencies of undergraduate business students. Journal of Education for Business. 2006;(4):205–9.
18.
Besterfield-Sacre M, Cox M, Borrego M, Beddoes K, Zhu J. Changing engineering education: views of us faculty, chairs, and deans. Journal of Engineering Education. 2014;(2):193–219.
19.
Borrego M, Bernhard J. The emergence of engineering education research as an internationally connected field of inquiry. Journal of Engineering Education. 2011;(1):14–47.
20.
Bulmer-Thomas V. The economic history of latin america since independence. 2003;
21.
Costa R, Mozina S, Pittia P. The regulation of food science and technology professions in europe. International Journal of Food Studies. 2014;(1).
22.
Dillon J, Rickinson M, Teamey K, Morris M, Choi M, Sanders D, et al. The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the uk and elsewhere. School Science Review. 2006;(320):107–11.
23.
Eccles J, Barber B. Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band: what kind of extracurricular involvement matters. Journal of Adolescent Research. 1999;(1):10–43.
24.
Flynn K, Bejarano B, Wahnstrom E, Echim C, Quintas M. Profile of currently employed european food scientists and technologists: education, experience and skills. International Journal of Food Studies. 2013;(2).
25.
Gair N. The history and future of food engineering. Food Engineering. 1997;3–19.
26.
Kasemodel MG, Makishi F, Souza R, Silva VL. Following the trail of crumbs: a bibliometric study on consumer behavior in the food science and technology field. International Journal of Food Studies. 2016;(1).
27.
Knight J. Internationalization remodeled: definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education. 2004;(1):5–31.
28.
Kostaropoulos A. Food engineering within sciences of food. International Journal of Food Studies. 2012;(2).
29.
Loncin M. Food engineering: principals and selected applications. Food science and technology. 2012;
30.
Lucena J, Downey G, Jesiek B, Elber S. Cadastro e-MEC de instituições e cursos de educação superior: Sistema e-Mec. Journal of Engineering Education. 2008;(4):433–47.
31.
Melsa J, Rajala S, Mohsen J. Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education. 2009;(3):209–209.
32.
Paisley K, Furman N, Sibthorp J, Gookin J. Student learning in outdoor education: a case study from the national outdoor leadership school. Journal of Experiential Education. 2008;(3):201–22.
33.
Roos Y, Fryer P, Knorr D, Schuchmann H, Schroen K, Schutyser M, et al. Food engineering at multiple scales: case studies, challenges and the future-a european perspective. Food Engineering Reviews. 2016;(2):91–115.
34.
Rychen D, Salganik L. Key competencies for a successful life and wellfunctioning society. 2003;
35.
Saguy I, Cohen E. Food engineering: attitudes and future outlook. Journal of Food Engineering. 2016;71–80.
36.
Saguy I, Singh R, Johnson T, Fryer P, Sastry S. Challenges facing food engineering. Journal of Food Engineering. 2013;(2):332–42.
37.
Silva V, Sereno A, Sobral P. Food industry and processing technology: on time to harmonize technology and social drivers. Food Engineering Reviews. 2018;(1):1–13.
38.
Skidmore T. Brazil: five centuries of change. 2009;
39.
Wood D. Problem based learning. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2003;(7384):1–16.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by