Different parameters in cider processing were evaluated using different cultivars of Norwegian-grown table apples measuring the quality of cider. Seven different apple cultivars were mixed into four different apple juice mixtures. In this experiment, we evaluated the maturation of the apples along with commercial cider yeast and spontaneous alcoholic fermentation. Other parameters were fermentation temperature and filtration along with content of polyphenols, organic acids and volatile compounds that was analysed as an effect of the fermentation process. Succinic acid was the major organic acid in apples and ciders. The different apple juice mixtures did not reveal pyruvic and acetic acids but they appeared in relatively high amount in the ciders. The level of citric acid increased from apple to cider. Chlorogenic acid was the major polyphenolic compound found from 13-109 mg L-1 in the apple juice mixtures and between 27-200 mg L-1 in the ciders. The higher alcohol 3-methyl-1-butanol appeared in relatively large amounts in all the ciders (91-166 mg L-1). The average content of acetaldehyde increased during the fermentation process, from apple juice mixtures 2.75 mg L-1 and 14.65 mg L-1 in the ciders. The content also increased for ethyl acetate with levels at 0.1 mg L-1 in the apple juice mixture and 20 mg L-1 in the cider. In the sensory evaluation experiment, the ciders produced from the apple cultivars Aroma, Gravenstein and Summerred got higher scores in fruitiness and complexity compared to the other apple juice mixtures.
Alberti A, Machado Dos Santos T, Ferreira Zielinski A, Eleuterio Dos Santos C, Braga C, Demiate I, et al. Impact on chemical profile in apple juice and cider made from unripe, ripe and senescent dessert varieties. 2016. p. 436–43.
2.
Alonso-Salces R, Korta E, Barranco A, Berrueta L, Gallo B, Vicente F. Determination of polyphenolic profiles of basque cider apple varieties using accelerated solvent extraction. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2001. p. 3761–7.
3.
Bamforth C, Lea J, Piggott. Fermented beverage production, 2nd edn. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2004. p. 1442–1442.
4.
Berry D, Slaughter J. Fermented beverage production. Springer; 2003. p. 25–39.
5.
Børve J, Vangdal E. X international controlled and modified atmosphere research conference 876. 2009. p. 399–400.
6.
Bütikofer U, Ardö Y. Quantitative determination of free amino acids in cheese. International Dairy Federation; 1999.
7.
Erken H. Stor kokebok for større og mindre husholdninger : Kokning, bakning, syltning, råsyltning, vinlegning, slaktning, hermetikk, sykekost og dietkost, menyer, anretning. Aschehoug; 1932.
8.
Fan W, Xu Y, Han Y. Quantification of volatile compounds in chinese ciders by stir bar sorptive extraction (sbse) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (gcms). Journal of the Institute of Brewing. 2011. p. 61–6.
9.
Gronnevik H, Falstad M, Narvhus J. Microbiological and chemical properties of Norwegian kefir during storage. International Dairy Journal. 2011. p. 601–6.
10.
Guyot S, Marnet N, Sanoner P, Drilleau JF. Methods in enzymology. Elsevier; 2001. p. 57–70.
11.
Jolicoeur C. The new cider maker’s handbook: A comprehensive guide for craft producers. Chelsea Green Publishing; 2013.
12.
Kahle K, Kraus M, Richling E. Polyphenol profiles of apple juices. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 2005. p. 797–806.
13.
Laaksonen O, Kuldjarv R, Paalme T, Virkki M, Yang B. Impact of apple cultivar, ripening stage, fermentation type and yeast strain on phenolic composition of apple ciders. Food Chemistry. 2017. p. 29–37.
14.
Lea A. Craft cider making. Crowood. IJFS. 2015. p. I84–96.
15.
Leforestier D, Ravon E, Muranty H, Cornille A, Lemaire C, Giraud T, et al. Genomic basis of the differences between cider and dessert apple varieties. Evolutionary Applications. 2015. p. 650–61.
16.
Milosevic T, Milosevic N, Mladenovic J. Tree vigor, yield, fruit quality, and antioxidant capacity of apple (malus x domestica borkh.) influenced by different fertilization regimes: Preliminary results. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2019. p. 48–57.
17.
Moe K, Porcellato D, Skeie S. Metabolism of milk fat globule membrane components by nonstarter lactic acid bacteria isolated from cheese. Journal of Dairy Science. 2013. p. 727–39.
18.
Planchon V, Lateur M, Dupont P, Lognay G. Ascorbic acid level of belgian apple genetic resources. Scientia Horticulturae. 2004. p. 51–61.
19.
Redalen G. Det norske hageselskap ; I kommisjon hos Grøndahl. 1991.
20.
Sanoner P, Guyot S, Marnet N, Molle D, Drilleau J. Polyphenol profiles of french cider apple varieties (malus domestica sp. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1999. p. 4847–53.
21.
Tsao R, Yang R, Xie S, Sockovie E, Khanizadeh S. Which polyphenolic compounds contribute to the total antioxidant activities of apple? Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2005. p. 4989–95.
22.
Verdu C, Gatto J, Freuze I, Richomme P, Laurens F, Guilet D. Comparison of Two Methods, UHPLC-UV and UHPLC-MS/MS, for the Quantification of Polyphenols in Cider Apple Juices. Molecules. 2013. p. 10213–27.
23.
Volden J, Borge G, Bengtsson G, Hansen M, Thygesen I, Wicklund T. Effect of thermal treatment on glucosinolates and antioxidant-related parameters in red cabbage (brassica oleracea l. ssp capitata f. rubra). Food Chemistry. 2008. p. 595–605.
24.
Wojdylo A, Oszmianski J, Laskowski P. Polyphenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of new and old apple varieties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008. p. 6520–30.
25.
Xu Y, Fan W, Qian M. Characterization of aroma compounds in apple cider using solvent-assisted flavor evaporation and headspace solid-phase microextraction. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2007. p. 3051–7.
26.
Ye M, Yue T, Yuan Y. Evolution of polyphenols and organic acids during the fermentation of apple cider. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2014. p. 2951–7.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.