Additions of barley flour alone or with combination of chestnut and acorn flour (30%; 30+5%; 30+10%) were aimed at increasing the dietary fibre content in wheat bread. In this regard, enhancement by acorn flour elevated the dietary fibre by a greater extent (up to 7.80%) compared to barley or chestnut flours. Increasing the proportion of non-traditional raw materials also influenced flour pasting properties during the amylograph test as well as the farinograph and extensigraph properties of nonfermented dough. In contrast to the wheat flour, analysis of Falling Number and Zeleny values showed a decrease in technological potential of flour composites of approximately 30%. Water absorption increased about 2 percentage points, mainly with enhancement by chestnut flour. All the non-traditional raw materials slowed dough development, whilst dough softening degree differed according to actual composition. Dough viscous and elastic properties worsened as shown by a decrease of in energy absorbed, depending on the type and the addition of the non-traditional products. Changes in flour composition were reflected in amylograph viscosity maximum, which became lower with increasing amounnts of chestnt and acorn flour. A significant worsening of the bread specific volume as well as of bread shape (vaulting) corresponded with a partial dilution of the gluten matrix. Compared to the wheat bread, 10% chestnut flour caused bread size to diminish to less than one half of the wheat loaf. Statistically, the principal features were water absorption, dough softening degree and extensigraph energy together with specific bread volume. In terms of wheat flour and bread quality, the influence of barley flour overcame the effects of adding chestnut or acorn flours.
Belcredi N, Ehrenbergerova J, Belakova S, Vaculova K. Barley grain as a source of health-beneficial substances. Czech Journal of Food Sciences. 2009;242-S244.
2.
Collar C, Santos E, Rosell C. Assessment of the rheological profile of fibreenriched bread doughs by response surface methodology. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;(3):820–6.
3.
Correia P, Beirao-Da-Costa M. Chestnut and acorn starch properties affected by isolation methods. Starchstarke. 2010;(8):421–8.
4.
Crea. Tabelle di composizione degli alimenti -3 -Farina di frumento tipo 00. 2015;
5.
Crea. Tabelle di composizione degli alimenti -11 -Farina di castagne. 2015;
6.
Dall’asta C, Cirlini M, Morini E, Rinaldi M, Ganino T, Chiavaro E. Effect of chestnut flour supplementation on physico-chemical properties and volatiles in bread making. Lwt-food Science and Technology. 2013;(1):233–9.
7.
Demirkesen I, Mert B, Sumnu G, Sahin S. Utilization of chestnut flour in gluten-free bread formulations. Journal of Food Engineering. 2010;(3):329–36.
8.
Efsa. Panel on dietetic products nutrition and allergies -scientific opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to beta-glucans from oats and barley and maintenance of normal blood ldl-cholesterol concentrations (id 1236, 1299), increase in satiety leading to a reduction in energy intake (id 851, 852), reduction of post-prandial glycaemic responses (id 821, 824), and "digestive function. EFSA Journal. 2011;(6):9.
9.
Gill S, Vasanthan T, Ooraikul B, Rossnagal B. Wheat bread quality as influenced by the substitution of waxy and regular barley flours in their native and cooked forms. Journal of Cereal Science. 2002;(2):239–51.
10.
Giovannelli C. La castagna: Dal bosco alla tavola tradizione ed innovazione the chestnut: From wood to tabel tradition and innovation. 2009;
11.
Gonzaga M, Batista M, Guiné R, Correia P. ICEUBI2015-international conference of engineering: Engineering for society. 2015;
12.
Hegazy N, Kamil M, Hussein A, Bareh G. Chemical and technological properties of improved biscuit by chestnut flour. International Journal of Food Nutritional Science. 2014;(6):7–15.
13.
Korus J, Witczak M, Ziobro R, Juszczak L. The influence of acorn flour on rheological properties of gluten-free dough and physical characteristics of the bread. European Food Research and Technology. 2015;(6):1135–43.
14.
Kovaříková D, Netolická V. Vzdělávací materiál pro předmět Technologická příprava. (Quality of cereals for processing in mill. Educational material for subject Technological training) (C. Střední průmyslová škola potravinářská Pardubice Pardubice. 2011;
15.
Kucerova J, Sottnikova V, Nedomova S. Influence of dietary fibre addition on the rheological and sensory properties of dough and bakery products. Czech Journal of Food Sciences. 2013;(4):340–6.
16.
Man S, Puacean A, Muste S, Muresan C, Frâncu AV. Chestnut flour addition influence on bread quality. Journal of Agroalimentary Processes and Technologies. 2012;(2):150–4.
17.
Moreira R, Chenlo F, Torres M, Prieto D. Influence of the particle size on the rheological behaviour of chestnut flour doughs. Journal of Food Engineering. 2010;(2):270–7.
18.
Pinna C. S71-S74. Science and Technology for the Safeguard of Cultural Heritage in the Mediterranean Basin. 2013;(3).
19.
Příhoda J, Hrušková M. Hodnocení kvality. Aplikace doporučených přístrojů, metod a interpretace výsledků pro praxi. (Quality evaluation. Application of recommended apparatuses, methods and results interpretation for praxis). 2017;104–8.
20.
Sabrin M. Characterization of acorn meal (Master’s thesis. 2009;
21.
Samuel D. Cereal foods and nutrition in ancient egypt. Nutrition. 1997;(6):579–80.
22.
Silva S, Costa E, Borges A, Carvalho A, Monteiro M, Pintado M. Nutritional characterization of acorn flour (a traditional component of the mediterranean gastronomical folklore). Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization. 2016;(3):584–8.
23.
Skendi A, Biliaderis C, Papageorgiou M, Izydorczyk M. Effects of two IJFS April. 2010;41–57.
24.
Dough & Bread Quality from Wheat-Acorn/Chestnut Flours 57 barley beta-glucan isolates on wheat flour dough and bread properties. Food Chemistry. (3):1159–67.
25.
Švec I, Hrušková M. Image data of crumb structure of bread from flour of czech spring wheat cultivars. Czech Journal of Food Sciences. 2004;(4):133–42.
26.
Yoo SH, Lee CS, Kim BS, Shin M. The properties and molecular structures of gusiljatbam starch compared to those of acorn and chestnut starches. Starch. 2012;(5):339–47.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
