Dietary fiber intake is significantly below the recommended daily allowances worldwide, making fortification of foods with dietary fiber a vital strategy. Simultaneously, there is a trend towards increased consumption of processed meat products containing substantial amounts of fat, making processed meat products an excellent vehicle to deliver fiber. In this study, the effects of adding four types of dietary fiber (Resistant Starch (RS), Polydextrose (POD), Fructooligosaccharides (FOS) and Galactooligosaccharides (GOS)) to chicken nuggets were investigated. Fibers were added at three levels (5, 10 and 15%) to replace 33.33, 66.66, and 100%, respectively, of the chicken skin. The difference between the removed quantity of chicken skin and added fiber was compensated with water. Chicken nuggets were evaluated by measuring color, texture, proximate composition, yield and consumers’ acceptability. Results indicated that replacement of the chicken skin entirely with dietary fiber is possible without negatively affecting the final product quality.
Akesowan A. Production and storage stability of formulated chicken nuggets using konjac flour and shiitake mushrooms. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2016;(10):3661–74.
2.
Alves L, Lorenzo J, Gonçalves C, Santos B, Heck R, Cichoski A, et al. Production of healthier bologna type sausages using pork skin and green banana flour as a fat replacers. Meat Science. 2016;73–8.
3.
Ammar M. Ash of meat. Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research. 2017;(2):415–23.
4.
Atughonu A, Zayas J, Herald T, Harbers L. Thermorheological properties and cooking yield of sausage-type products as affected by levels of fat and added-water. Journal of Food Quality. 1998;(2):129–43.
5.
Bis-Souza C, Henck J, Barretto A. Performance of low-fat beef burger with added soluble and insoluble dietary fibers. Food Sci-ence and Technology. 2018;522–9.
6.
Bolger Z, Brunton N, Lyng J, Monahan F. Comminuted meat products : consumption, composition, and approaches to healthier formulations. Food Reviews International. 2017;(2):143–66.
7.
Bonato P, Perlo F, Fabre R, Teira G, Tisocco O, Dalzotto M. Effect of Sodium Chloride Reduction and Wheat Fiber Addition on Chicken Nugget Quality. British Journal of Applied Science a Technology. 2016;(3):1–9.
8.
Bruno-Barcena J, Azcarate-Peril M. Galacto-oligosaccharides and Colorectal Cancer: Feeding our Intestinal Probiome. Journal of functional foods. 2015;92–108.
9.
Cáceres E, García M, Toro J, Selgas M. The effect of fructooligosaccharides on the sensory characteristics of cooked sausages. Meat Science. 2004;(1):87–96.
10.
Choe JH, Kim HY, Lee JM, Kim YJ, Kim CJ. Quality of frankfurter-type sausages with added pig skin and wheat fiber mixture as fat replacers. Meat Science. 2013;(4):849–54.
11.
Das A, Anjaneyulu A, Kondaiah N. Development of Reduced Beany Flavor Full-fat Soy Paste for Comminuted Meat Products. Journal of Food Science. 2006;(5):395-S400.
12.
Dethmers A, Civille G, Eggert J, Erhardt J, Hootman R, Jehle K, et al.
13.
Whitlock S. Sensory Evalu-IJFS October. 1981;354–73.
14.
High fiber, low fat chicken nuggets 371 ation Guide for Testing Food and Beverage Products. Food Technology. (11):50–9.
15.
Fang J. Feasibility of Functional Fibers in Soy Chicken Nuggets. 2015;
16.
Felisberto M, Galvão M, Picone C, Cunha R, Pollonio M. Effect of prebiotic ingredients on the rheological properties and microstructure of reduced-sodium and low-fat meat emulsions. LWT -Food Science and Technology. 2015;(1):148–55.
17.
Gedikoglu A. Use of citrus fiber in ground beef meatballs as a functional ingredient. 2015;
18.
Ibrahim O. Functional Oligosaccharide: Chemicals Structure, Manufacturing, Health Benefits, Applications and Regulations. Journal of Food Chemistry a Nanotechnology. 2018;(4):65–76.
19.
Iso. Meat and meat products -Determination of total fat content. 1973;
20.
Jimenez-Colmenero F, Cofrades S, Lpez-Lopez I, Ruiz-Capillas C, Pintado T, Solas M. Technological and sensory characteristics of reduced/lowfat, low-salt frankfurters as affected by the addition of konjac and seaweed. Meat Science. 2010;(3):356–63.
21.
Kilincceker O, Kurt S. Effects of inulin, carrot and cellulose fibres on the properties of raw and fried chicken meatballs. South African Journal of Animal Science. 2018;(1):39–47.
22.
Kilincceker O, Yilmaz M. Effects Of Different Gums On The Some Properties Of Fried Beef Patties. Carpathian Journal Of Food Science And Technology. 2016;(2):63–70.
23.
Kim HY, Kim KJ, Lee JW, Kim GW, Choe JH, Kim HW, et al. Quality Evaluation of Chicken Nugget Formulated with Various Contents of Chicken Skin and Wheat Fiber Mixture. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources. 2015;(1):19–26.
24.
Kim HY, Lee ES, Jeong JY, Choi JH, Choi YS, Han DJ, et al. Effect of bamboo salt on the physicochemical properties of meat emulsion systems. Meat Science. 2010;(4):960–5.
25.
Kumar R, Sharma B, Mendiratta S, Malav O, Talukder S, Irshad A. Efficacy of Peanut Paste as Functional Component in Premium Mutton Nuggets. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 2017;(3):12907.
26.
Lairon D, Arnault N, Bertrais S, Planells R, Clero E, Hercberg S, et al. Dietary fiber intake and risk factors for cardiovascular disease in French adults. The American. Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2005;(6):1185–94.
27.
Mallika E, Prabhakar K, Reddy P. Low Fat Meat Products: An Overview. Veterinary World. 2009;(9):364–6.
28.
Mehta N, Ahlawat S, Sharma D, Dabur R. Novel trends in development of dietary fiber rich meat products-a critical review. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2015;(2):633–47.
29.
Mittal G, Barbut S. Effects of fat reduction on frankfurters’ physical and sensory characteristics. Food Research IJFS. 1994;354–73.
30.
International. (5):425–31.
31.
Nath P, Kumar V, Praveen P, Ganguly S. Effect of chicken skin, soy protein and olive oil on quality characteristics of chicken nuggets. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology. 2016;(3):1574–85.
32.
Para P, Ganguly S. Effect of bajra flour (Pearl millet) on some quality and sensory attributes of chicken nuggets. Asian Journal of Animal Science. 2015;(2):107–14.
33.
Pérez-Chabela M, Hernández-Alcántara A. Food processing for increased quality and consumption. 2018;219–50.
34.
Polizer Y, Pompeu D, Hirano M, Freire M, Trindade M. Development and evaluation of chicken nuggets with partial replacement of meat and fat by pea fibre. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology. 2015;(1):62–9.
35.
Prinyawiwatkul W, Mcwatters K, Beuchat L, Phillips R. Optimizing Acceptability of Chicken Nuggets Containing Fermented Cowpea and Peanut Flours. Journal of Food Science. 1997;(4):889–905.
36.
Raigond P, Ezekiel R, Raigond B. Resistant starch in food: a review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2015;(10):1968–78.
37.
Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee Circulation. 2008;(4):25-e146.
38.
Sathu T, Kuttinarayanan P, John P. Effect of Incorporation of Soluble Dietary Fibre on the Physico-Chemical and Sensory Properties of Chicken Nuggets. Madras Agricultural Journal. 2017;(7–9):292–4.
39.
Serdaroglu M. Improving low fat meatball characteristics by adding whey powder. Meat Science. 2006;(1):155–63.
40.
Shan L, Regan Á, Monahan F, Li C, Lalor F, Murrin C, et al. Consumer preferences towards healthier reformulation of a range of processed meat products. British Food Journal. 2017;(9):2013–26.
41.
Sharima-Abdullah N, Hassan C, Arifin N, Huda-Faujan N. Physicochemical properties and consumer preference of imitation chicken nuggets produced from chickpea flour and textured vegetable protein. International Food Research Journal. 2018;(3):1016–25.
42.
Singh O, Singh J, Bharti M, Soni K. Refrigerated storage stability of chicken nuggets containing pea flour. Journal Of Food Science And Technology-Mysore. 2008;(5):460–2.
43.
Soher E, Sawsan E, Mona A, Ibrahim A, Hathout B, Sabry A. Characterization and microbiological quality of low-fat chicken burger containing defatted peanut flour. Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 2013;(11):5599–608.
44.
Stender S, Dyerberg J, Astrup A. Fast food: unfriendly and unhealthy. International Journal of Obesity. 2007;(6):887–90.
45.
Ijfs October. 2022;354–73.
46.
Takruri H, Alkurd R. Intakes of fats, cholesterol, fiber and micronutrients as risk factors for cardiovascular disease in jordan. Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2014;(2):19–126.
47.
Tas H, Osanmaz E, Özer C, Kiliç B. Quality characteristics and storage stability of gluten-free coated chicken nuggets. Carpathian Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2016;(4):91–102.
48.
Veena N, Nath S, Arora S. Polydextrose as a functional ingredient and its food applications: a review. Indian Journal of Dairy Science. 2016;(3):239–51.
49.
Verma A, Pathak V, Singh V, Umaraw P. Storage study of chicken meatballs incorporated with green cabbage ( Brassica olerecea ) at refrigeration temperature (4 ± 1°C) under aerobic packaging. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 2016;(1):409–14.
50.
Verma A, Banerjee R, Sharma B. Quality characteristics of low fat chicken nuggets: Effect of salt substitute blend and pea hull flour. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2015;(4):2288–95.
51.
Verma A, Rajkumar V, Kumar S. Effect of amaranth and quinoa seed flour on rheological and physicochemical properties of goat meat nuggets. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2019;(11):5027–35.
52.
Verma A, Sharma B, Banerjee R. Effect of sodium chloride replacement and apple pulp inclusion on the physico-chemical, textural and sensory properties of low fat chicken nuggets. LWT -Food Science and Technology. 2010;(4):715–9.
53.
Rosli W, Solihah W, Aishah W, Nik Fakurudin M, Mohsin N, S. Colour, textural properties, cooking characteristics and fibre content of chicken patty added with oyster mushroom (Pleurotus sajorcaju). International Food Research Journal. 2011;(2):621–7.
54.
Yadav S, Pathera A, Islam R, Malik A, Sharma D. Effect of wheat bran and dried carrot pomace addition on quality characteristics of chicken sausage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2018;(5):729–37.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.