Influence of Raw Meat Content on 3D-Printing and Rheological Properties

Marius Herold Orcid logo ,
Marius Herold
Contact Marius Herold

University of Applied Science Fulda, Regional Innovation Centre for Health and Quality of Life Fulda (RIGL)

Sören Morick ,
Sören Morick

University of Applied Science Fulda, Department of Food Technology

Oliver Hensel Orcid logo ,
Oliver Hensel

Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Section of Agricultural Engineering, University of Kassel

Uwe Grupa Orcid logo
Uwe Grupa

University of Applied Science Fulda, Department of Food Technology

Published: 18.05.2021.

Volume 10, Issue 1 (2021)

pp. 195-202;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/10.1.2021.a6

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of raw chicken meat content on the rheological properties and 3D printability of minced meat mixtures using different concentrations of raw and cooked chicken meat. The meat mass contained yolk, crushed ice, lean raw meat and cooked meat with a high concentration of connective tissue. The concentrations of raw meat added to cooked meat as a percentage of the total weight of meat were 0; 30; 40; 50; 60; 70 and 100. To determine the rheological properties, amplitude sweep and frequency sweep were carried out with a Rheostress RS 300 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). Cubes were printed, and the printability and optical impression were evaluated using grades from 1-5. The results showed that rheological properties had a strong influence on the printability of meat mass and it is necessary for G' (storage modulus) at the LVR (linear viscoelastic region) to be higher than 7000 Pa. The complex viscosity |η*| should be higher than 170 Pa, at a shear stress τ = 10 Pa, and a frequency f = 10 Hz used to guarantee sufficient solidity.

Keywords

References

1.
Avery M, Klein S, Richardson R, Bartlett P, Adams G, Dickin F, et al. Nip & digital fabrication conference. Society for Imaging Science and Technology. 2014;140–5.
2.
Daniel H, Klein U, Varianz D. Personalisierte ernährung. J Für Ernährungsmedizin. 2016;6–9.
3.
Ebermann R, Elmadfa I. Lehrbuch lebensmittelchemie und ernährung. 2008;
4.
Fastermann P. 3d-druck/rapid prototyping: Eine zukunftstechnologie-kompakt erklärt. 2012;
5.
Godoi F, Prakash S, Bhandari B. 3d printing technologies applied for food design: Status and prospects. Journal of Food Engineering. 2016;44–54.
6.
Liu C, Ho C, Wang J. IOP Conference Series-Materials Science and Engin-eering. 2nd International Conference on Innovative Engineering Materials (ICIEM). 2018;
7.
Liu Z, Zhang M, Bhandari B, Yang C. Impact of rheological properties of mashed potatoes on 3d printing. Journal of Food Engineering. 2018;76–82.
8.
Meichsner G, Mezger T, Schröder J. Lackeigenschaften messen und steuern. 2003;
9.
Mezger T. Das Rheologie Handbuch: 5. Farbe Und Lack. 2016;
10.
Rezler R, Piotrowska E, Dolata W, Wojciechowski M. Effect of the substitution of meat by a protein preparation on the rheological properties of finely-comminuted sausage forcemeats. Acta Agrophysica. 2007;(1):221–31.
11.
Shao Y, Chaussy D, Grosseau P, Beneventi D. Use of microfibrillated cellulose/lignosulfonate blends as carbon precursors: Impact of hydrogel rheology on 3d printing. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2015;(43):10575–82.
12.
Sielaff H. Fleischtechnologie. Mitteilungen Aus Dem Gebiete Der Lebensmitteluntersuchung Und Hygiene. 1996;368–9.
13.
Wang J, Shaw L. Materials Science and Engineering A-structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing. 2005;(1–2):314–21.
14.
Zhang M, Vora A, Han W, Wojtecki R, Maune H, Le A, et al. Dual-responsive hydrogels for direct-write 3d printing. Macromolecules. 2015;(18):6482–8.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by