A methodology to promote business development from research outcomes in food science and technology

Eduardo Cardoso
Eduardo Cardoso
Contact Eduardo Cardoso

CBQF – Centro de Biotecnologia e Quımica Fina – Laboratorio Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa Portugal

Published: 18.04.2015.

Volume 4, Issue 1 (2015)

pp. 88-94;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/4.1.2015.a7

Abstract

Valorization of knowledge produced in research units has been a major challenge for research universities in contemporary societies. The prevailing forces have led these institutions to develop a “third mission”, the facilitation of technology transfer and activity in an entrepreneurial paradigm. Effective management of challenges encountered in the development of academic entrepreneurship and the associated valorization of knowledge produced by universities are major factors to bridge the gap between research and innovation in Europe. The need to improve the existing institutional knowledge valorization processes, concerning entrepreneurship and business development and the processes required were discussed. A case study was designed to describe the institutional knowledge valorization process in a food science and technology research unit and a related incubator, during a five year evaluation period that ended in 2012. The knowledge valorization processes benefited from the adoption of a structured framework methodology that led to ideas and teams from a business model generation to client development, in parallel, when possible, with an agile product/service development. Although academic entrepreneurship engagement could be improved, this case study demonstrated that stronger skills development was needed to enable the researcher to be more aware of business development fundamentals and therefore contribute to research decisions and the valorisation of individual and institutional knowledge assets. It was noted that the timing for involvement of companies in the research projects or programs varied with the nature of the research.

Keywords

References

1.
Blank S. The four steps to the epiphany. 2005;
2.
Blank S, Dorf B. The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. 2012;
3.
Etzkowitz H. The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. 2001;(2):18–29.
4.
Think Small First: A “Small Business Act” for. Europe. 2008;
5.
Entrepreneurship 2020 Action Plan. 2012;
6.
Horizon 2020: research and innovation to boost growth and jobs in Europe. 2013;
7.
Freitas I, Clausen T, Fontana R, Verspagen B. Formal and informal external linkages and firms’ innovative strategies. A cross-country comparison. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2011;(1):91–119.
8.
Lurie M. What is a business model? A new approach. 2012;
9.
Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 1994;
10.
Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y. Business Model Generation: A Handbook For Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers Author: Alexander Osterwalder. 2010;
11.
Perkmann M, Tartari V, Mckelvey M, Autio E, Brostrom A, D’este P, et al. Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy. 2012;(2):423–42.
12.
Ries E. The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. 2011;
13.
Tapscott D, Williams A. Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. 2006;
14.
Teece D. Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning. 2010;(2–3):172–94.
15.
Tellis W. Application of a case study methodology. The qualitative report. 1997;(3):1–17.
16.
Wennekers S, Thurik R. Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. 1999;
17.
Small Business Economics. (1):27–55.
18.
Wikinomics concept. Wikinomics Project. 2013;
19.
Yin R. Case study research: Design and methods. 1994;
20.
Zott C, Amit R. The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal. 2008;(1):1–26.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by