More articles from Volume 5, Issue 1, 2016
The emulsifying effect of biosurfactants produced by food spoilage organisms in Nigeria
Pronase hydrolysis as a pretreatment for quantifying Maillard intermediates during toasting of cornflakes
Developing and delivering food systems training programs for 21st century audiences
A food recall case study in Australia – Towards the development of food safety applications for consumers
The Atlantic diet – Origin and features
Barriers to using consumer science information in food technology innovations: An exploratory study using Delphi methodology
,
Marian E. Raley
,
Maddalena Ragona
,
Siet J. Sijtsema
,
Arnout R.H. Fischer
Lynn J. Frewer
Abstract
References
1.
Bettman JR, Luce MF, Payne JW. Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research. 1998;25(3):187–217.
2.
Bouchereau V, Rowlands H. Methods and techniques to help quality function deployment (QFD). Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2000;7(1):8–20.
3.
Chan LK, Wu ML. Quality function deployment: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research. 2002;143(3):463–97.
4.
Costa AIA, Jongen WMF. New insights into consumer-led food product development. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2006;17(8):457–65.
5.
Costa-Font M, Gil JM, Traill WB. Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food Policy. 2008;33(2):99–111.
6.
David K, Thompson P. What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology?: Social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs. 2011;
7.
Fao. Rome Declaration and World Food Summit Plan of Action. Rome. Retrieved from www. 1996;1–10.
8.
Fischer ARH, De Jong AEI, De Jonge R, Frewer LJ, Nauta MJ. Improving Food Safety in the Domestic Environment: The Need for a Transdisciplinary Approach. Risk Analysis. 2005;25(3):503–17.
9.
Frewer LJ, Bergmann K, Brennan M, Lion R, Meertens R, Rowe G, et al. Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: Implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2011;22(8):442–56.
10.
Frewer LJ, Fischer ARH, Wentholt MTA, Marvin HJP, Ooms BW, Coles D, et al. The use of Delphi methodology in agrifood policy development: Some lessons learned. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2011;78(9):1514–25.
11.
Frewer LJ, Gupta N, George S, Fischer ARH, Giles EL, Coles D. Consumer attitudes towards nanotechnologies applied to food production. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2014;40(2):211–25.
12.
Frewer LJ, van der Lans IA, Fischer ARH, Reinders MJ, Menozzi D, Zhang X, et al. Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2013;30(2):142–52.
13.
Gaskell G, Allum N, Wagner W, Kronberger N, Torgersen H, Hampel J, et al. GM Foods and the Misperception of Risk Perception. Risk Analysis. 2004;24(1):185–94.
14.
Gibson GR, Probert HM, Loo JV, Rastall RA, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics. Nutrition Research Reviews. 2004;17(2):259–75.
15.
Gordon T, Pease A. RT Delphi: an efficient, “round-less” almost real time Delphi method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2006;(4):321–33.
16.
Gupta N, Fischer ARH, Frewer LJ. Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review. Public Understanding of Science. 2011;21(7):782–95.
17.
Henson S. Demand-side constraints on the introduction of new food technologies: The case of food irradiation. Food Policy. 1995;20(2):111–27.
18.
Jacobsen LF, Grunert KG, Søndergaard HA, Steenbekkers B, Dekker M, Lähteenmäki L. Improving internal communication between marketing and technology functions for successful new food product development. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2014;37(2):106–14.
19.
Kleijnen M, Lee N, Wetzels M. An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2009;30(3):344–57.
20.
Linstone H, Turoff M. 1975;
21.
Macnaghten P. Nanotechnology, risk and public perceptions. 2014;167–81.
22.
Macoubrie J. Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2004;(4):395–405.
23.
Mussatto S, Mancilha I. 2007;(3):587–97.
24.
Rendueles E, Omer MK, Alvseike O, Alonso-Calleja C, Capita R, Prieto M. Microbiological food safety assessment of high hydrostatic pressure processing: A review. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2011;44(5):1251–60.
25.
Ronteltap A, van Trijp JCM, Renes RJ, Frewer LJ. Consumer acceptance of technology-based food innovations: Lessons for the future of nutrigenomics. Appetite. 2007;49(1):1–17.
26.
Schutz H, Bruhn C, Diazknauf K. Consumer attitude toward irradiated foods -effects of labeling and benefits information. Food Technology. 1989;(10):80–6.
27.
Shim SM, Seo SH, Lee Y, Moon GI, Kim MS, Park JH. Consumers’ knowledge and safety perceptions of food additives: Evaluation on the effectiveness of transmitting information on preservatives. Food Control. 2011;22(7):1054–60.
28.
Siegrist M, Keller C, Kastenholz H, Frey S, Wiek A. Laypeople’s and Experts’ Perception of Nanotechnology Hazards. Risk Analysis. 2007;27(1):59–69.
29.
Sijtsema SJ, Backus GBC, Linnemann AR, Jongen WMF. Consumer orientation of product developers and their product perception compared to that of consumers. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2004;15(10):489–97.
30.
Stewart-Knox B, Mitchell P. What separates the winners from the losers in new food product development? Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2003;14(1–2):58–64.
31.
Thompson PB. Food Biotechnology’s Challenge to Cultural Integrity and Individual Consent. The Hastings Center Report. 1997;27(4):34.
32.
Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(50):20260–4.
33.
Toepfl S, Mathys A, Heinz V, Knorr D. Review: Potential of High Hydrostatic Pressure and Pulsed Electric Fields for Energy Efficient and Environmentally Friendly Food Processing. Food Reviews International. 2006;22(4):405–23.
34.
Torgersen H. Synthetic biology in society: learning from past experience? Systems and synthetic biology. 2009;(1–4):9–17.
35.
Turoff M. The design of a policy delphi. Technological forecasting and social change. 1970;(2):149–71.
36.
Uzogara SG. The impact of genetic modification of human foods in the 21st century. Biotechnology Advances. 2000;18(3):179–206.
37.
van Kleef E, van Trijp HCM, Luning P. Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques. Food Quality and Preference. 2005;16(3):181–201.
38.
Walls J, Rowe G, Frewer L. Stakeholder engagement in food risk management. Public Understanding of Science. 2010;20(2):241–60.
39.
Wentholt MTA, Rowe G, König A, Marvin HJP, Frewer LJ. The views of key stakeholders on an evolving food risk governance framework: Results from a Delphi study. Food Policy. 2009;34(6):539–48.
Citation
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
Google scholar:
See link
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
