Food science and technology students self-evaluate soft and technical skills

Katherine M. Flynn ,
Katherine M. Flynn
Contact Katherine M. Flynn

The European Association for Food Safety, SAFE consortium, Rue Vanderborght, Brussels, Belgium

Peter Ho ,
Peter Ho

School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Margarida C. Vieira ,
Margarida C. Vieira

Faculty of Bioscience and Technology for Food Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy

Paola Pittia ,
Paola Pittia

Faculty of Bioscience and Technology for Food Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy

Marco Dalla Rosa
Marco Dalla Rosa

Interdepartmental Centre for Agri-Food Industrial Research, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Published: 18.10.2017.

Volume 6, Issue 2 (2017)

pp. 129-138;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/6.2.2017.a1

Abstract

Food Scientists and Technologists (FS&T) need diverse skills in the globalized food and drink sector: Food-specific or scientific / technical skills and generic or intuitive soft skills. This study determined how satisfied FS&T students were with overall improvement, and in key technical and soft skills, based on their university work; and if satisfaction was linked to geography, degree in progress, anticipated degree, anticipated work place or anticipated job responsibility. An on-line survey was completed by 267 students in over 20 countries using a 5-point Likert scale to evaluate satisfaction. Responses were analyzed by the Friedman or Kruskal Wallis tests for more than two groups, otherwise by the Wilcoxon Signed Rank or Mann-Whitney tests. There were no differences in Overall Satisfaction with technical and soft skills training. Among soft skills, training in Working with Others and Being Responsible were more often rated “Excellent” and students were more satisfied with their training than with Solving Problems, Communication and Positive Attitude. Students anticipating a job with high responsibility were more satisfied with overall soft skill training and with 3 of the 5 specific soft skills. Among technical skills, students were more satisfied with improvement in basic sciences (Microbiology, Chemistry, Processing, Safety), and those in Northern Europe were more satisfied with overall technical training. These data show variations in perception and/or efficacy of technical and soft skill training in Food Science programmes and underline the need for separate attention to the incorporation of soft skill training into the design of FS&T courses.

Keywords

References

1.
Armstrong R, Baillie C. Australian Association of Engineering Education (AAEE) Conference Abstracts. 2011.
2.
Brown G, Harris L. Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment. 2013. p. 367–93.
3.
Cefic. European Chemical Industry Council. Skills for Innovation in the European Chemical Industry. Brussels BE. 2009.
4.
Di Palo M. Rating satisfaction research: is it square poor, square fair, square good, square very good, or square excellent? Arthritis Care and Research. 1997. p. 422–30.
5.
Eafs. European Association for Food Safety, SAFE Consortium. Keeping food safety on the agenda. Brussels BE: SAFE Consortium. 2013.
6.
Ec. EU R&D Scorecard: The 2015 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. Publications Office of the European Union; 2015.
7.
Egfsn. Strategic research and innovation agenda (2013-2020 and Beyond). 2009. p. 129–38.
8.
Falchikov N, Boud D. Student self-assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 1989. p. 395–430.
9.
Fde. Food Drink Europe. Data and Trends of the European Food & Drink Industry. Brussels BE. 2015.
10.
Flynn K, Ruiz-Bejarano B, Wahnstrom E, Echim C, Quintas M. Profile of currently employed european food scientists and technologists: education, experience and skills. International Journal of Food Studies. 2013. p. 37–149.
11.
Flynn K, Wahnstrom E, Popa M, Ruiz-Bejarano B, Quintas M. Ideal skills for european food scientists and technologists: identifying the most desired knowledge, skills and competencies. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. 2013. p. 246–55.
12.
Mayor L, Flynn K, Dermesonluoglu E, Pittia P, Baderstedt E, Ruiz-Bejarano B, et al. Skill development in food professionals: a european study. European Food Research and Technology. 2015. p. 871–84.
13.
Napoleon L, Freedman D, Seetharaman K, Sharma P. An educational needs assessment of pennsylvania workforce: opportunities to redefine secondary career and technical education to meet food industry needs. Journal of Food Science Education. 2006. p. 19–23.
14.
Dimatteo R, Hays M, R. The significance of patients’ perceptions of physician conduct. Journal of Community Health. 1980. p. 18–34.
15.
Seibert S, Kraimer M, Crant J. Times Higher Education. World University Rankings. Personnel Psychology. 2001. p. 845–74.
16.
Ijfs October. 2017. p. 129–38.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by