Dried Fruit Matrices Incorporated with a Probiotic Strain of Lactobacillus plantarum

Catarina Ribeiro ,
Catarina Ribeiro

CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Quımica Fina – Laboratorio Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal

Ricardo Freixo ,
Ricardo Freixo

CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Quımica Fina – Laboratorio Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Cat´olica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal

Joana Silva ,
Joana Silva

CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Qu´ımica Fina – Laborat´orio Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal

Paul Gibbs ,
Paul Gibbs

CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Qu´ımica Fina – Laborat´orio Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa/Porto, Porto, Portugal

Alcina Morais ,
Alcina Morais

CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Qu´ımica Fina – Laborat´orio Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Cat´olica Portuguesa/Porto, Porto, Portugal

Paula Teixeira
Paula Teixeira
Contact Paula Teixeira

CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Qu´ımica Fina – Laborat´orio Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Cat´olica Portuguesa/Porto, Porto, Portugal

Published: 18.04.2014.

Volume 3, Issue 1 (2014)

pp. 69-73;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/3.1.2014.a6

Abstract

The development of fruits and vegetables containing probiotics is a topic of great interest and popularity for health-conscious consumers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of using dried fruit matrices as delivery vehicles for probiotics. Different fruits — kiwi, mango, strawberry, pineapple, banana — were used as food matrices to test the viability of a strain of Lactobacillus plantarum, which was determined after drying at 40ºC and at different storage times. Cell survival after drying decreased by ca. 1 log in banana and strawberry, to 3 log, for kiwi. The bacterial numbers in banana and strawberry dried pieces at the time of storage at room temperature and 4ºC were approximately 107 cfu/g. After 37 days storage at room temperature, no viable counts were observed in any of the fruits studied. However, at 4ºC after this period of time, viable cells were detected for all the fruits (1.9x106 cfu/g, 1.5x105 cfu/g 1.5x105 cfu/g, 4.7x104 cfu/g 8.0x103 cfu/g, for strawberry, banana, kiwi, mango and pineapple, respectively).

Keywords

References

1.
Alegre I, Vinas I, Usall J, Anguera M, Abadias M. Microbiological and physicochemical quality of fresh-cut apple enriched with the probiotic strain lactobacillus rhamnosus gg. Food Microbiology. 2011. p. 59–66.
2.
Do Espirito Santo A, Perego P, Converti A, Oliveira M. Influence of food matrices on probiotic viability -a review focusing on the fruity bases. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2011. p. 377–85.
3.
Fito P, Chiralt A, Betoret N, Gras M, Chafer M, Martinez-Monzo J, et al. Vacuum impregnation and osmotic dehydration in matrix engineering -application in functional fresh food development. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2001. p. 264–73.
4.
Golowczyc M, Silva J, Abraham A, De Antoni G, Teixeira P. Preservation of probiotic strains isolated from kefir by spray drying. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2010. p. 7–12.
5.
Lourens-Hattingh A, Viljoen B. Yogurt as probiotic carrier food. International Dairy Journal. 2001. p. 1–17.
6.
Mattila-Sandholm T, Myllarinen P, Crittenden R, Mogensen G, Fonden R, Saarela M. NIZO Dairy Conference on Food Microbes. Journal. 2002. p. 173–82.
7.
Palafox-Carlos H, Ayala-Zavala J, Gonzalez-Aguilar G. The role of dietary fiber in the bioaccessibility and bioavailability of fruit and vegetable antioxidants. Journal of Food Science. 2011. p. 6-R15.
8.
Rêgo A, Freixo R, Silva J, Gibbs P, Morais A, Teixeira P. Focusing on Modern Food Industry. 2013. p. 138–43.
9.
Weinbreck F, Bodnar I, Marco M. Can encapsulation lengthen the shelf-life of probiotic bacteria in dry products? International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2010. p. 364–7.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by