Issue image

More articles from Volume 6, Issue 2, 2017

Impact of selected polyphenolics on the structural properties of model lipid membranes – a review

Influences of physicochemical stresses on injury and inactivation behaviour of Listeria innocua

Effect of Grewia venusta FRESEN mucilage on the proximate composition, physical and sensory properties of bread produced from wheat and cassava composite flours

Effect of tuna skin gelatin-based coating enriched with seaweed extracts on the quality of tuna fillets during storage at 4 °C

Drying characteristics of zucchini and empirical modeling of its drying process

Citations

Crossref Logo

11

Crossref Logo

David Julian McClements, Lutz Grossmann

(2022)

Next-Generation Plant-based Foods

, ()

10.1007/978-3-030-96764-2_9

Crossref Logo

JinTao He, Wen Li, Jing Deng, QinLu Lin, Jie Bai, Lin Zhang, Yong Fang

(2023)

An insight into the health beneficial of probiotics dairy products: a critical review

Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 63(32)

10.1080/10408398.2022.2090493

Crossref Logo

Salmaa Sayyidah Nazziyah, Epi Taufik, Kintoko Kintoko

(2025)

Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Combined Polyherbal Yogurt

Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 30(4)

10.18343/jipi.30.4.675

Crossref Logo

Diego Galvan, Luciane Effting, Hágata Cremasco, Carlos Adam Conte-Junior

(2021)

Recent Applications of Mixture Designs in Beverages, Foods, and Pharmaceutical Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Foods, 10(8)

10.3390/foods10081941

Crossref Logo

Ecem AKAN, Oktay YERLİKAYA, Derya SAYGILI, Özer KINIK

(2021)

Farklı starter kültür kullanımının yoğurtların tekstürel ve viskozite özelliklerine etkisi

Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 58(3)

10.20289/zfdergi.838079

Crossref Logo

Aju Tjatur Krisnaningsih, Purwadi Purwadi, Herly Evanuarini, Djalal Rosyidi

(2019)

The Effect of Incubation Time to The Physicochemical and Microbial Properties of Yoghurt with Local Taro (Colocasia Esculenta(L.) Schott) Starch as Stabilizer

Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal, 7(2)

10.12944/CRNFSJ.7.2.23

Crossref Logo

I. A. Gurskiy, A. V. Landikhovskaya, A. A. Tvorogova

(2022)

Defrosted products with preserved micro- and macrostructure

Food systems, 5(3)

10.21323/2618-9771-2022-5-3-195-201

Crossref Logo

Antonina Tvorogova, Igor Gurskiy, Natalya Kazakova

(2024)

Effect of Fermented Milk Base on Quality Indicators of Ice-Cream and Fermented Whipped Dairy Desserts

Dairy industry, ()

10.21603/1019-8946-2024-6-14

Crossref Logo

Richa Soni, Nayan K. Jain, Vidhi Shah, Jinal Soni, Dipali Suthar, Priyal Gohel

(2020)

Development of probiotic yogurt: effect of strain combination on nutritional, rheological, organoleptic and probiotic properties

Journal of Food Science and Technology, 57(6)

10.1007/s13197-020-04238-3

Crossref Logo

Samuel Aforijiku, Christopher Fakorede, Arinola Adediran, Isaiah Okere

(2026)

Effect of isolated probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum N24 on growth and haematological performance in male albino rats

Food and Feed Research, 53(1)

10.5937/ffr0-56057

Crossref Logo

Diana A. Al-Quwaie, Aminah Allohibi, Majidah Aljadani, Amira M. Alghamdi, Asmaa Ali Alharbi, Roua S. Baty, Safa H. Qahl, Ohud Saleh, Amani Osman Shakak, Fatimah S. Alqahtani, Osama S. F. Khalil, Mohamed T. El-Saadony, Ahmed M. Saad

(2023)

Characterization of Portulaca oleracea Whole Plant: Evaluating Antioxidant, Anticancer, Antibacterial, and Antiviral Activities and Application as Quality Enhancer in Yogurt

Molecules, 28(15)

10.3390/molecules28155859

The interaction effect of mixing starter cultures on homemade natural yogurt’s pH and viscosity

Hadi A. Dahlan ,
Hadi A. Dahlan
Contact Hadi A. Dahlan

School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology , Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Malaysia

Norrakiah A. Sani
Norrakiah A. Sani

School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Malaysia

Published: 18.10.2017.

Volume 6, Issue 2 (2017)

pp. 152-158;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/6.2.2017.a3

Abstract

Dairy yogurts are common food products consumed by people all over the world. Due to the simple process, many people have made their own natural yogurt at home. The fermentation due to the starter culture causes the textural properties of dairy yogurt. However, the literature is surprisingly scarce on the topic of starter culture interactions in the development of textural properties of dairy yogurt. This study investigated the interaction effect of three common starter cultures, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophiles, on the viscosity of homemade yogurt. Using Design Expert software, a 10-run mixture model experiment was designed to examine the textural properties developed by single or multiple inoculation of these starter cultures. All yogurt formulations reached the isoelectric point of milk and had pHs in the range 3.97 to 4.32. Yogurt formulations with L. acidophilus and S. thermophilus resulted in viscosities which were similar to commercial yogurt viscosity (1.77 Pa·s), while L. bulgaricus resulted in yogurt with a lower viscosity. Based on the mixture model, L. acidophilus had most influence on the yogurt viscosity, followed by S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus. In conclusion, L. acidophilus can be used as a single starter culture or combined with other starter cultures to develop high viscosity homemade yogurt. A Combination of S. thermophilus and L. acidphilus can also be used to develop high viscosity yogurts. However, L. bulgaricus should not be inoculated alone or become a dominant ratio in multiple starter culture inoculation as it will decrease the overall homemade yogurt viscosity.

Keywords

References

1.
Mazzoli R, Bosco F, Mizrahi I, Bayer E, Pessione E. Towards lactic acid bacteria-based biorefineries. Biotechnology Advances. 2014;(7):1216–36.
2.
Zourari A, Accolas J, Desmazeaud M. Metabolism and biochemical characteristics of yogurt bacteria -a review. Lait. 1992;(1):1–34.
3.
Yusnita H, Aida W, Maskat M, Aminah A. Processing performance of coated chicken wings as affected by wheat, rice and sago flours using response surface methodology. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2007;(5):535–42.
4.
Tamime A, Robinson R. Yoghurt: science and technology. (Chap. Introduction. 1999;1–5.
5.
Smith D. Yogurt made simple. Pullman. 2015;
6.
Sadler G, Murphy P. Food analysis. 2010;219–38.
7.
O’rell K, Chandan R. Manufacturing yogurt and fermented milks. 2013;263–95.
8.
Noh D, Gilliland S. Influence of bile on cellular integrity and β-galactosidase activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Journal of Dairy Science. 1993;(5):77454–8.
9.
Nguyen TT, Nguyen H, Arreola S, Mlynek G, Djinović-Carugo K, Mathiesen G, et al. Homodimeric β-galactosidase from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus dsm 20081: expression in Lactobacillus plantarum and biochemical characterization. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2012;(7):1713–21.
10.
Mcsweeney P, Sousa M. Biochemical pathways for the production of flavour compounds in cheeses during ripening: a review. Lait. 2000;(3):293–324.
11.
Anjum N, Maqsood S, Masud T, Ahmad A, Sohail A, Momin A. Lactobacillus acidophilus: characterization of the species and application in food production. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2014;(9):1241–51.
12.
Leroy F, De Vuyst L. Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2004;(2):67–78.
13.
Lee W, Lucey J. Formation and physical properties of yogurt. Asianaustralasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2010;(9):1127–36.
14.
Henika R. Use of response-surface methodology in sensory evaluation. Food Technology. 1982;(11):96–101.
15.
Gahruie H, Eskandari M, Mesbahi G, Hanifpour M. Scientific and technical aspects of yogurt fortification: a review. Food Science and Human Wellness. 2015;(1):1–8.
16.
Fisberg M, Machado R. History of yogurt and current patterns of consumption. Nutrition Reviews. 2015;(1):4–7.
17.
Drouault S, Anba J, Corthier G. Streptococcus thermophilus is able to produce a β-galactosidase active during its transit in the digestive tract of germ-free mice. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002;(2):938–41.
18.
Delorme C. Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: Streptococcus thermophilus. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2008;(3):274–7.
19.
Broadbent J, Mcmahon D, Welker D, Oberg C, Moineau S. Biochemistry, genetics, and applications of exopolysaccharide production in Streptococcus thermophilus: a review. Journal of Dairy Science. 2003;(2):407–23.
20.
Ares G, Gonçalvez D, Pérez C, Reolón G, Segura N, Lema P, et al. Influence of gelatin and starch on the instrumental and sensory texture of stirred yogurt. International Journal of Dairy Technology. 2007;(4):263–9.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by