The interaction effect of mixing starter cultures on homemade natural yogurt’s pH and viscosity

Hadi A. Dahlan ,
Hadi A. Dahlan
Contact Hadi A. Dahlan

School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology , Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Malaysia

Norrakiah A. Sani
Norrakiah A. Sani

School of Chemical Sciences and Food Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Malaysia

Published: 18.10.2017.

Volume 6, Issue 2 (2017)

pp. 152-158;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/6.2.2017.a3

Abstract

Dairy yogurts are common food products consumed by people all over the world. Due to the simple process, many people have made their own natural yogurt at home. The fermentation due to the starter culture causes the textural properties of dairy yogurt. However, the literature is surprisingly scarce on the topic of starter culture interactions in the development of textural properties of dairy yogurt. This study investigated the interaction effect of three common starter cultures, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophiles, on the viscosity of homemade yogurt. Using Design Expert software, a 10-run mixture model experiment was designed to examine the textural properties developed by single or multiple inoculation of these starter cultures. All yogurt formulations reached the isoelectric point of milk and had pHs in the range 3.97 to 4.32. Yogurt formulations with L. acidophilus and S. thermophilus resulted in viscosities which were similar to commercial yogurt viscosity (1.77 Pa·s), while L. bulgaricus resulted in yogurt with a lower viscosity. Based on the mixture model, L. acidophilus had most influence on the yogurt viscosity, followed by S. thermophilus and L. bulgaricus. In conclusion, L. acidophilus can be used as a single starter culture or combined with other starter cultures to develop high viscosity homemade yogurt. A Combination of S. thermophilus and L. acidphilus can also be used to develop high viscosity yogurts. However, L. bulgaricus should not be inoculated alone or become a dominant ratio in multiple starter culture inoculation as it will decrease the overall homemade yogurt viscosity.

Keywords

References

1.
Anjum N, Maqsood S, Masud T, Ahmad A, Sohail A, Momin A. Lactobacillus acidophilus: characterization of the species and application in food production. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2014;(9):1241–51.
2.
Ares G, Gonçalvez D, Pérez C, Reolón G, Segura N, Lema P, et al. Influence of gelatin and starch on the instrumental and sensory texture of stirred yogurt. International Journal of Dairy Technology. 2007;(4):263–9.
3.
Broadbent J, Mcmahon D, Welker D, Oberg C, Moineau S. Biochemistry, genetics, and applications of exopolysaccharide production in Streptococcus thermophilus: a review. Journal of Dairy Science. 2003;(2):407–23.
4.
Delorme C. Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: Streptococcus thermophilus. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2008;(3):274–7.
5.
Drouault S, Anba J, Corthier G. Streptococcus thermophilus is able to produce a β-galactosidase active during its transit in the digestive tract of germ-free mice. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002;(2):938–41.
6.
Fisberg M, Machado R. History of yogurt and current patterns of consumption. Nutrition Reviews. 2015;(1):4–7.
7.
Gahruie H, Eskandari M, Mesbahi G, Hanifpour M. Scientific and technical aspects of yogurt fortification: a review. Food Science and Human Wellness. 2015;(1):1–8.
8.
Henika R. Use of response-surface methodology in sensory evaluation. Food Technology. 1982;(11):96–101.
9.
Lee W, Lucey J. Formation and physical properties of yogurt. Asianaustralasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2010;(9):1127–36.
10.
Leroy F, De Vuyst L. Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2004;(2):67–78.
11.
Mazzoli R, Bosco F, Mizrahi I, Bayer E, Pessione E. Towards lactic acid bacteria-based biorefineries. Biotechnology Advances. 2014;(7):1216–36.
12.
Mcsweeney P, Sousa M. Biochemical pathways for the production of flavour compounds in cheeses during ripening: a review. Lait. 2000;(3):293–324.
13.
Nguyen TT, Nguyen H, Arreola S, Mlynek G, Djinović-Carugo K, Mathiesen G, et al. Homodimeric β-galactosidase from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus dsm 20081: expression in Lactobacillus plantarum and biochemical characterization. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2012;(7):1713–21.
14.
Noh D, Gilliland S. Influence of bile on cellular integrity and β-galactosidase activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Journal of Dairy Science. 1993;(5):77454–8.
15.
O’rell K, Chandan R. Manufacturing yogurt and fermented milks. 2013;263–95.
16.
Sadler G, Murphy P. Food analysis. 2010;219–38.
17.
Smith D. Yogurt made simple. Pullman. 2015;
18.
Tamime A, Robinson R. Yoghurt: science and technology. (Chap. Introduction. 1999;1–5.
19.
Yusnita H, Aida W, Maskat M, Aminah A. Processing performance of coated chicken wings as affected by wheat, rice and sago flours using response surface methodology. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2007;(5):535–42.
20.
Zourari A, Accolas J, Desmazeaud M. Metabolism and biochemical characteristics of yogurt bacteria -a review. Lait. 1992;(1):1–34.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by