This work aimed to determine the mechanical properties of rough and dehulled rice grains, for different moisture contents, by obtaining their rupture force, deformation, maximum compression force and proportional deformity modulus under a compression test. Rice grains, with moisture content varying from 0.12 to 0.30 (d.b.), were subject to an uniaxial compression in order to analyze these properties. On reducting moisture content the rupture force increased from 37.2 to 70.6 N for dehulled rice and 48.0 to 79.5 N for rough rice. The average compression force varied from 131 to 171 N for dehulled rice and 203 to 283 N for rough rice. The value range of proportional deformity modulus was from 5.5 x 109 to 7.4 x 109 Pa for dehulled rice and 9.5 x 109 to 12.3 x 109 Pa for rough rice. Rough rice presented more resistance to compression compared to dehulled rice.
Kunze O, Choudhury M. Moisture adsorption related to the tensile strength of rice. Cereal Chemistry. 1972;(6):684–96.
2.
Zhang Q, Li Y, Puri V, Manbeck H. Physical properties effect on stress-strain behavior of wheat en masse.2. constitutive elastoplastic parameter dependence on initial bulk density and moisture content. Transactions of the ASAE. 1989;(1):158–66.
3.
White G, Ross I, Poneleit C. Stress crack development in popcorn as influenced by drying and rehydration processes. Transactions of the ASAE. 1982;(3):768–72.
4.
Vursavus K, Ozguven F. Mechanical behaviour of apricot pit under compression loading. Journal of Food Engineering. 2004;(2):255–61.
5.
Ribeiro D, Corrêa P, Goneli A, Rodrigues D. held at universidade luterana do brasil, canoas. 2005;1–4.
6.
Resende O. Variação das propriedades físicas e mecânicas e da qualidade do feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) durante a secagem e o armazenamento (doctoral dissertation). (Doctoral dissertation. 2006;
7.
Prussia S, Campbell D. Apparent modulus elasticity of maturing pecans. Transactions of the ASAE. 1985;(4):1290–6.
8.
Oliveros-Tascón C, Montoya-Restrepo E, Ayala A. Efecto de la broca del café em la firmeza del grano em los estados de cereja, pergamino húmedo y pergamino seco. Cenicafe. 2002;(1):25–33.
9.
Mohsenin N. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. 1986;
10.
Liu M, Haghighi K, Stroshine R, Ting E. Mechanical-properties of the soybean cotyledon and failure strength of soybean kernels. Transactions of the ASAE. 1990;(2):559–66.
11.
Li Y, Zhang Q, Puri V, Manbeck H. Physical properties effect on stress-strain behavior of wheat en masse.1. load response dependence on initial bulk density in moisture content. Transactions of the ASAE. 1989;(1):194–202.
12.
Laskowski J, Lysiak G. th European Symposium on Comminution and Classification. Powder Technology. 1999;(1–3):83–8.
13.
Altuntas E, Yildiz M. Effect of moisture content on some physical and mechanical properties of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) grains. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;(1):158–66.
14.
Henry Z, Su B, Zhang H. Resistance of soya beans to compression. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 2000;(2):175–81.
15.
Gustafson R, Hall G. Density and porosity changes of shelled corn during drying. Transactions of the ASAE. 1972;(3):523.
16.
Gupta R, Das S. Fracture resistance of sunflower seed and kernel to compressive loading. Journal of Food Engineering. 2000;(1):1–8.
17.
Guha M, Ali S. Extrusion cooking of rice: effect of amylose content and barrel temperature on product profile. Journal of Food Processing And Preservation. 2006;(6):706–16.
18.
Goneli A, Correa P, Resende O, Reis Neto S. Electrical conductivity for quality evaluation of popcorn kernels subjected to mechanical damage. Biosystems Engineering. 2007;(3):361–7.
19.
Dong R, Lu Z, Liu Z, Koide S, Cao W. Effect of drying and tempering on rice fissuring analysed by integrating intrakernel moisture distribution. Journal of Food Engineering. 2010;(2):161–7.
20.
Couto S, Batista A, Peixoto C, Devilla I. Comportamento mecânico de frutos de café: módulo de deformidade. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental. 2002;(2):285–94.
21.
Corrêa P, Da Silva F, Jaren C, Afonso Junior P, Arana I. Physical and mechanical properties in rice processing. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;(1):137–42.
22.
Batista C, Couto S, Cecon P, Peixoto A. 2003;42–53.
23.
Bargale P, Irudayaraj J, Marquis B. Studies on rheological behavior of canola and wheat. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 1995;(4):267–74.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
