Microbial quality and shelf life prediction of vacuum-packaged ready to eat beef rounds containing gum arabic

Johnson K. Mwove ,
Johnson K. Mwove

Department of Dairy and Food Science and Technology, Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya

Symon M. Mahungu ,
Symon M. Mahungu
Contact Symon M. Mahungu

Department of Dairy and Food Science and Technology, Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya

Lilian A. Gogo ,
Lilian A. Gogo

Department of Dairy and Food Science and Technology, Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya

Ben N. Chikamai ,
Ben N. Chikamai

Kenya Forest Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya

Mary Omwamba
Mary Omwamba

Department of Dairy and Food Science and Technology, Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya

Published: 18.04.2017.

Volume 6, Issue 1 (2017)

pp. 24-33;

https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/6.1.2017.a3

Abstract

Research has shown that gum arabic from Acacia Senegal var. kerensis can be used in beef rounds, at a level of 2.5% of the formulated product weight, as a binder and texture modifier. However, the effect of gum arabic addition on the microbial quality and shelf life of the resulting meat product has not yet been reported. Thus, the objective of this work was to study the microbial quality of beef rounds containing 2.5% gum arabic and to study shelf life based on the growth parameters of Total Viable Counts (TVC) and Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB). Beef round samples were injected at 30% with curing brines containing gum arabic and cooked through boiling. The growth kinetics of LAB and TVC were studied for vacuum packaged sliced beef round samples stored at 7 °C and 15 °C for a period of 21 days. Baranyi and modified Gompertz models were used to fit the LAB and TVC data obtained using DMFit. Results of microbial analysis indicated that coliforms, yeasts and molds as well as pathogenic bacteria; Salmonella, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus, were below detection limit. In addition, TVC and LAB were found to be 1.87 ± 1.09 and 1.25 ± 0.75 Log10 CFU g−1 , respectively. The results of accuracy analysis showed that both the Baranyi and modified Gompertz models were adequate in representing the bacterial growth in beef rounds injected with curing brines containing gum arabic. The predicted shelf life was found to be between 84.3 – 88.1 h and 158.0 – 173.1 h at 15 °C and 7 °C, respectively. 

Keywords

References

1.
Aggelis G, Samelis J, Metaxopoulos J. A novel modelling approach for predicting microbial growth in a raw cured meat product stored at 3 degrees c and at 12 degrees c in air. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1998. p. 39–52.
2.
Aoac. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (17th Ed.) AOAC International. 2000.
3.
Baranyi J, Roberts T. A dynamic approach to predicting bacterial-growth in food. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1994. p. 277–94.
4.
Cayre M, Vignolo G, Garro O. Modeling lactic acid bacteria growth in vacuum-packaged cooked meat emulsions stored at three temperatures. Food Microbiology. 2003. p. 561–6.
5.
Fao/Who ; Org, Feng CH, Drummond L, Sun DW. Expert Committee on Food Additive. Food & Agriculture. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2005. p. 2659–67.
6.
Feng CH, Sun DW, Martin J, Zhang ZH. Effects of different cooling methods on shelf-life of cooked jumbo plain sausages. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2013. p. 426–33.
7.
Fu B, Labuza T. Quality in frozen food. Springer US; 1997. p. 377–415.
8.
Gibson A, Bratchell N, Roberts T. Predicting microbial-growth -growth-responses of salmonellae in a laboratory medium as affected by ph, sodiumchloride and storage-temperature. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1988. p. 155–78.
9.
Gibson A, Roberts T. th Australian food microbiology conf, surfers paradise. Food Australia. 1989. p. 1075–9.
10.
Hamasaki Y, Ayaki M, Fuchu H, Sugiyama M, Morita H. Behavior of psychrotrophic lactic acid bacteria isolated from spoiling cooked meat products. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2003. p. 3668–71.
11.
Hongpattarakere T, Rattanaubon P, Buntin N. Improvement of freezedried lactobacillus plantarum survival using water extracts and crude fibers from food crops. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2013. p. 1885–96.
12.
Hu P, Zhou G, Xu X, Li C, Han Y. Characterization of the predominant spoilage bacteria in sliced vacuumpacked cooked ham based on 16s rdnadgge. Food Control. 2009. p. 99–104.
13.
Kreyenschmidt J, Huebner A, Beierle E, Chonsch L, Scherer A, Petersen B. Determination of the shelf life of sliced cooked ham based on the growth of lactic acid bacteria in different steps of the chain. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2010. p. 510–20.
14.
Li M, Sun X, Zhao G, Huang X, Zhang J, Tian W, et al. Comparison of mathematical models of lactic acid bacteria growth in vacuum-packaged raw beef stored at different temperatures. Journal of Food Science. 2013. p. 600–4.
15.
Liu F, Yang R, Li Y. Correlations between growth parameters of spoilage micro-organisms and shelf-life of pork stored under air and modified atmosphere at -2, 4 and 10 degrees c. Food Microbiology. 2006. p. 578–83.
16.
Mataragas M, Drosinos E, Vaidanis A, Metaxopoulos I. Development of a predictive model for spoilage of cooked cured meat products and its validation under constant and dynamic temperature storage conditions. Journal of Food Science. 2006. p. 157–67.
17.
Mataragas M, Skandamis P, Nychas GJ, Drosinos E. Modeling and predicting spoilage of cooked, cured meat products by multivariate analysis. Meat Science. 2007. p. 348–56.
18.
Mwove J, Gogo L, Chikamai B, Omwamba M, Mahungu S. Preparation and quality evaluation of extended beef rounds containing gum arabic from acacia senegal var. kerensis. Food and Nutrition Sciences. 2016. p. 977.
19.
Nychas GJ, Skandamis P, Tassou C, Koutsoumanis K. Meeting of the middle section of the American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological soc inc. Meat Science. 2008. p. 77–89.
20.
Perez-Chabela M, Lara-Labastida R, Rodriguez-Huezo E, Totosaus A. Effect of spray drying encapsulation of thermotolerant lactic acid bacteria on meat batters properties. Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2013. p. 1505–15.
21.
Pexara E, Metaxopoulos J, Drosinos E. Evaluation of shelf life of cured, cooked, sliced turkey fillets and cooked pork sausages “piroski” stored under vacuum and modified atmospheres at +4 and degrees c. Meat Science. 2002. p. 33–43.
22.
Ray B, Bhunia A. Fundamental food microbiology. CRC press; 2007.
23.
Samelis J, Georgiadou K, Ana A, Franco B, Schaffner D. The microbial association of greek taverna sausage stored at 4 and 10 degrees c in air, vacuum or 100% carbon dioxide, and its spoilage potential. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2000. p. 267–73.
24.
Santos E, Jaime I, Rovira J, Lyhs U, Korkeala H, Bjorkroth J. Characterization and identification of lactic acid bacteria in "morcilla de burgos. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2005. p. 285–96.
25.
Simonin H, Duranton F, De Lamballerie M. New insights into the high-pressure processing of meat and meat products. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2012. p. 285–306.
26.
Skandamis P, Nychas G. International Symposium on Frontiers in Microbial Preservation and Fermentation. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2002. p. 35–45.
27.
Slongo A, Rosenthal A, Quaresma Camargo L, Deliza R, Mathias S, Falcao De Aragao G. Modeling the growth of lactic acid bacteria in sliced ham processed by high hydrostatic pressure. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2009. p. 303–6.
28.
Steele J, Stiles M. Microbial quality of vacuum packaged sliced ham. Journal of Food Protection. 1981. p. 435.
29.
Sutherland J, Bayliss A, Roberts T. Predictive modeling of growth of staphylococcus-aureus -the effects of temperature, ph and sodium-chloride. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 1994. p. 217–36.
30.
Vermeiren L, Devlieghere F, De Graef V, Debevere J. In vitro and in situ growth characteristics and behaviour of spoilage organisms associated with anaerobically stored cooked meat products. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2005. p. 33–42.

Citation

Copyright

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles

Indexed by