The molecular structure of Traditional Balsamic Vinegar (TBV) undergoes shear-induced and timedependent jamming transitions due to the high solute concentration and self-assembling phenomena of high molecular size melanoidins with very-long relaxation times (12 years at least or more than 25). The purpose of this work was to perform a descriptive and quantitative evaluation of relationships between rheological properties, vinegar composition, and perceptual assessment of sensory properties according to the official sensory procedure. With this aim, vinegars having quality traits matching legal requirements for the PDO designation were analyzed for their reducing sugars (glucose and fructose), volatile acidity, fixed acidity, pH, Brix degree, and density as well as for their flow behaviour and dynamic viscosity over a wide range of shear rates. Results showed that flow behaviour of TBV was affected by jamming properties over wide-scale ranges of shear rate producing flow instability below a shear rate of 60 s−1 . Homogeneous, continuous flow was found at medium-high shear rates with thickening and/or thinning traits. A common onset for the structure scaling was mathematically estimated to occur close to when the density was 1.32 gmL−1 . Comparative analysis of rheological, compositional and sensory properties suggested that the colloidal jamming of the vinegar melanoidins dominated the total olfactive and gustative stimuli, and determined the classification of the vinegars that had a higher dynamic viscosity but more homogeneous flow as being of the highest commercial quality category. A robust statistical model was proposed encoding for the top-down decision-making process for quality assignment according to the official sensory procedure, using composition and flow properties as predictor variables.
Akhtar M, Stenzel J, Murray B, Dickinson E. Conference on Food Colloids. Food Hydrocolloids. 2005;(3):521–6.
2.
Boquet R, Chirife J, Iglesias H. Equations for fitting water sorption isotherms of foods .2. evaluation of various 2-parameter models. Journal of Food Technology. 1978;(4):319–27.
3.
Camacho S, Dop M, De Graaf C, Stieger M. S1583-S1588. Journal of Food Sci-ence. 2015;(7).
4.
Cates M, Wittmer J, Bouchaud J, Claudin P. Jamming, force chains, and fragile matter. Physical Review Letters. 1998;(9):1841–4.
5.
Chen J, Engelen L. Food oral processing: fundamentals of eating and sensory perception. 2012;
6.
Cocchi M, Durante C, Grandi M, Lambertini P, Manzini D, Marchetti A. Simultaneous determination of sugars and organic acids in aged vinegars and chemometric data analysis. Talanta. 2006;(5):1166–75.
7.
Cook D, Hollowood T, Linforth R, Taylor A. Oral shear stress predicts flavour perception in viscous solutions. Chemical Senses. 2003;(1):11–23.
8.
Coussot P, Ovarlez G. Physical origin of shear-banding in jammed systems. European Physical Journal E. 2010;(3):183–8.
9.
Duran Guerrero E, Chinnici F, Natali N, Natera Marin R, Riponi C. Solid-phase extraction method for determination of volatile compounds in traditional balsamic vinegar. Journal of Separation Science. 2008;3030–6.
10.
Falcone P. Crystallization and jamming in the traditional balsamic vinegar. Food Research International. 2010;(8):2217–20.
11.
Falcone P, Boselli E, Frega N. Structure-composition relationships of the traditional balsamic vinegar close to jamming transition. Food Research International. 2011;(6):1613–9.
12.
Falcone P, Chillo S, Giudici P, Del Nobile M. Measuring rheological properties for applications in quality assessment of traditional balsamic vinegar: description and preliminary evaluation of a model. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;(1):95–112.
13. :
240.
14.
Falcone P, Giudici P. Molecular size and molecular size distribution affecting traditional balsamic vinegar aging. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008;(16):7057–66.
15.
Falcone P, Mozzon M, Frega N. Structure-composition relationships of the traditional balsamic vinegar of modena close to jamming transition (part ii): threshold control parameters. Food Research International. 2012;(1):75–84.
16.
Falcone P, Verzelloni E, Tagliazucchi D, Giudici P. A rheological approach to the quantitative assessment of traditional balsamic vinegar quality. Journal of Food Engineering. 2008;(3):433–43.
17.
Gebhard S. A practical approach to rheology and rheometry. 2000;4.
18.
Giudici P, Falcone P, Scacco A, Lanza C. Sensory analysis of the traditional balsamic vinegar. Industrie delle Bevande. 2009;(224):27–49.
19.
Hollowood T, Linforth R, Taylor A. The effect of viscosity on the perception of flavour. Chemical Senses. 2002;(7):583–91.
20.
Holmes W, Callaghan P, Vlassopoulos D, Roovers J. Shear banding phenomena in ultrasoft colloidal glasses. Journal of Rheology. 2004;(5):1085–102.
21.
Krieger I, Dougherty T. A mechanism for non-newtonian flow in suspensions of rigid spheres. Transactions of the Society of Rheology. 1959;(1):137–52.
22.
Lemmetti F, Falcone P, Giudici P. Traditional balsamic vinegar: the role of the viscosity on the objective and perceived quality. Industr Bevande. 2013;9–21.
23.
Lemmetti F, Solieri L, Bonciani T, Zanichelli G, Giudici P. Sensory analy-sis of traditional balsamic vinegars: current state and future perspectives. Acetic Acid Bacteria. 2014;(1).
24.
Liu A, Nagel S. Nonlinear dynamics: jamming is not just cool any more. Nature. 1998;(6706):21–2.
25.
Liu A, Nagel S. Jamming and rheology: constrained dynamics on microscopic and macroscopic scales. 2001;
26.
Mezzenga R, Schurtenberger P, Burbidge A, Michel M. Understanding foods as soft materials. Nature Materials. 2005;(10):729–40.
27.
Plessi M, Monzani A, Coppini D. Determination of the monosaccharide and alcohol content of balsamic and other vinegars by enzymatic methods. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry. 1988;(1):25–30.
28.
Princen H, Kiss A. Rheology of foams and highly concentrated emulsions .4. an experimental-study of the shear viscosity and yield stress of concentrated emulsions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1989;(1):90396–8.
29.
Schall P, Van Hecke M. Shear bands in matter with granularity. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 2010;67–88.
30.
Shama F, Parkinson C, Sherman P. Identification of stimuli controlling the sensory evaluation of viscosity i. non-oral methods. Journal of Texture Studies. 1973;(1):102–10.
31.
Tagliazucchi D, Verzelloni E, Conte A. Contribution of melanoidins to the antioxidant activity of traditional balsamic vinegar during aging. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 2010;(5):1061–78.
32.
Trappe V, Prasad V, Cipelletti L, Segre P, Weitz D. Jamming phase diagram for attractive particles. Nature. 2001;(6839):772–5.
33.
Trulsson M, Essick G. Lowthreshold mechanoreceptive afferents in the IJFS April. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1997;(2):737–48.
34.
Ubbink J, Burbidge A, Mezzenga R. Food structure and functionality: a soft matter perspective. Soft Matter. 2008;(8):1569–81.
35.
Verzelloni E, Tagliazucchi D, Conte A. Relationship between the antioxidant properties and the phenolic and flavonoid content in traditional balsamic vinegar. Food Chemistry. 2007;(2):564–71.
36.
Vingerhoeds M, De Wijk R, Zoet F, Nixdorf R, Van Aken G. How emulsion composition and structure affect sensory perception of lowviscosity model emulsions. Food Hydrocolloids. 2008;(4):631–46.
37.
Wood F. Psychophysical studies on the consistency of liquid foods. Rheology and Texture of Food Stuffs, SCI Monograph. 1968;(27):40–9.
38.
Zahn S, Hoppert K, Ullrich F, Rohm H. Dairy-based emulsions: viscosity affects fat difference thresholds and sweetness perception. Foods. 2013;(4):521–33.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
